Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="imp4pdabest" data-source="post: 7808640" data-attributes="member: 623196">They will both be very efficient at that wattage. Both of those speakers take WAAAAAAY more rms wattage than they have stated. The Bostons will have a little better tweeter, they will play loud and sound clean doing it. The Pioneers will also play loud, but you&#039;ll have to play with the EQ to get it to how you want the tweeter to sound. So considering those factors, I&#039;d roll with the Boston. But then I throw in the midbass and Bostons have always been known to kinda lack in the midbass department, but they make up for it with their loud, efficient tweeters. I think you would really enjoy the Bostons. But if it were me, I would roll with the Pioneers since I like to have that midbass up front.(For what it&#039;s worth, I listen to mainly lounge/neu jazz music. No metal, a little rock &amp;amp; a little hip hop. I&#039;m a **** for loud, clear highs that can be heard from a far.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="imp4pdabest, post: 7808640, member: 623196"] They will both be very efficient at that wattage. Both of those speakers take WAAAAAAY more rms wattage than they have stated. The Bostons will have a little better tweeter, they will play loud and sound clean doing it. The Pioneers will also play loud, but you'll have to play with the EQ to get it to how you want the tweeter to sound. So considering those factors, I'd roll with the Boston. But then I throw in the midbass and Bostons have always been known to kinda lack in the midbass department, but they make up for it with their loud, efficient tweeters. I think you would really enjoy the Bostons. But if it were me, I would roll with the Pioneers since I like to have that midbass up front. (For what it's worth, I listen to mainly lounge/neu jazz music. No metal, a little rock & a little hip hop. I'm a **** for loud, clear highs that can be heard from a far.) [/QUOTE]

Verification