Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Being openly trash talked
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chevillac" data-source="post: 2251920" data-attributes="member: 553407"><p>Despite what we were told as kids, martial artists are not required to register their hands and feet as deadly weapons. However, whether the hands and feet of a martial artist can ever be considered as deadly weapons is a major issue currently before the courts. The debate is as follows.</p><p></p><p>Most states impose additional criminal penalties for injuries that are inflicted or aggravated by the inappropriate use of a dangerous or deadly weapon. Many of those states define a deadly weapon as "anything", including any instrument, article, device, material, or substance, which, under the circumstances it is used, or in the manner it is used, is capable of inflicting death or serious bodily injury.</p><p></p><p>Where death or serious bodily injury results from the inappropriate use of one's hands or feet, should a jury, under the circumstances of the case, be allowed to consider whether those hands or feet constituted deadly weapons under the above definition?</p><p></p><p>Slightly more than half the states have entertained the question, and the courts are divided on the issue. A plurality of the courts (AL, AZ, AR, CA, FL, ID, IL, LA, MA, MI, MO, NE, NY, OR, TN, UT, and WI) have taken the view that hands and feet should not be considered deadly weapons. Most have reasoned that when enacting dangerous weapons statutes, legislators intended to control the use of instruments that are external to the body, not a part of the body, and therefore, hands and feet cannot be classified as deadly weapons.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=martial+arts+hands+lethal+weapons&amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;fr=moz2&amp;u=tafkac.org/faq2k/legal_2007.html&amp;w=martial+arts+hands+lethal+weapons&amp;d=IKbnTyQ8NjQz&amp;icp=1&amp;.intl=us" target="_blank">http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=martial+arts+hands+lethal+weapons&amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;fr=moz2&amp;u=tafkac.org/faq2k/legal_2007.html&amp;w=martial+arts+hands+lethal+weapons&amp;d=IKbnTyQ8NjQz&amp;icp=1&amp;.intl=us</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chevillac, post: 2251920, member: 553407"] Despite what we were told as kids, martial artists are not required to register their hands and feet as deadly weapons. However, whether the hands and feet of a martial artist can ever be considered as deadly weapons is a major issue currently before the courts. The debate is as follows. Most states impose additional criminal penalties for injuries that are inflicted or aggravated by the inappropriate use of a dangerous or deadly weapon. Many of those states define a deadly weapon as "anything", including any instrument, article, device, material, or substance, which, under the circumstances it is used, or in the manner it is used, is capable of inflicting death or serious bodily injury. Where death or serious bodily injury results from the inappropriate use of one's hands or feet, should a jury, under the circumstances of the case, be allowed to consider whether those hands or feet constituted deadly weapons under the above definition? Slightly more than half the states have entertained the question, and the courts are divided on the issue. A plurality of the courts (AL, AZ, AR, CA, FL, ID, IL, LA, MA, MI, MO, NE, NY, OR, TN, UT, and WI) have taken the view that hands and feet should not be considered deadly weapons. Most have reasoned that when enacting dangerous weapons statutes, legislators intended to control the use of instruments that are external to the body, not a part of the body, and therefore, hands and feet cannot be classified as deadly weapons. [URL="http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=martial+arts+hands+lethal+weapons&ei=UTF-8&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&fr=moz2&u=tafkac.org/faq2k/legal_2007.html&w=martial+arts+hands+lethal+weapons&d=IKbnTyQ8NjQz&icp=1&.intl=us"]http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=martial+arts+hands+lethal+weapons&ei=UTF-8&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&fr=moz2&u=tafkac.org/faq2k/legal_2007.html&w=martial+arts+hands+lethal+weapons&d=IKbnTyQ8NjQz&icp=1&.intl=us[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Being openly trash talked
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list