Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Feandil" data-source="post: 1395495" data-attributes="member: 558570">I admittedly didn&#039;t pay attention to the online antics of either sideall I remember is AA leaving I don&#039;t recall Chad trashing XBL^2saying other technologies are better/cheaper and offer the same benefits is undoubtably true... and that&#039;s no sign of anything else malicious that I&#039;ve seenDan himself said in the Adire forum that XBL^2 is superior to LMT and split coil... and in some ways it is... but in a lot of important ways it&#039;s notand those aren&#039;t even close to the only ways to achieve flat BLI don&#039;t doubt Chad &quot;found&quot; something as good or better than XBL2...to be honest Chad thought Dan was stating something negative about his products ... whether or not this was Dan&#039;s intention that&#039;s how it came off to a lot of peopleThere are plenty of ways to approach a speaker design and XBL2 while overall of Split coil, LMT, XBL2 comparison it happens to be seemingly the most efficent/lowest inductance you forget the other 4-5 ways to achieve a flat BLand also XBL2 will have the lowest power handling of the bunch and the most costs associated with it...seemingly adding on top of that royalties etc it&#039;s not a very positive thing for a lot of companies... and having a owner of the technology seemingly saying &quot;your XBL2 isn&#039;t as good as my XBL2&quot; will undoubtably ruffle already hurting feathersjust my 2 cents... as I try to see it from a more business point of view from both sides</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Feandil, post: 1395495, member: 558570"] I admittedly didn't pay attention to the online antics of either side all I remember is AA leaving I don't recall Chad trashing XBL^2 saying other technologies are better/cheaper and offer the same benefits is undoubtably true... and that's no sign of anything else malicious that I've seen Dan himself said in the Adire forum that XBL^2 is superior to LMT and split coil... and in some ways it is... but in a lot of important ways it's not and those aren't even close to the only ways to achieve flat BL I don't doubt Chad "found" something as good or better than XBL2... to be honest Chad thought Dan was stating something negative about his products ... whether or not this was Dan's intention that's how it came off to a lot of people There are plenty of ways to approach a speaker design and XBL2 while overall of Split coil, LMT, XBL2 comparison it happens to be seemingly the most efficent/lowest inductance you forget the other 4-5 ways to achieve a flat BL and also XBL2 will have the lowest power handling of the bunch and the most costs associated with it... seemingly adding on top of that royalties etc it's not a very positive thing for a lot of companies... and having a owner of the technology seemingly saying "your XBL2 isn't as good as my XBL2" will undoubtably ruffle already hurting feathers just my 2 cents... as I try to see it from a more business point of view from both sides [/QUOTE]

Verification