Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Are you living in a computer simulation?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Papermaker85" data-source="post: 8548129" data-attributes="member: 572595"><p>that lead me to believe that carbon dating and genetic tested not nearly as advance and accurate as they claim..</p><p></p><p>looking into it they NO REAL CLUE. they are guessing at this **** and are likely wrong..</p><p></p><p>only 15% of the population or so they say IS RH negative. which if you do some research this protein is always found in our supposed ancestors..</p><p></p><p>everything I find on the subject that says there is nothing special about the RH- blood seems to come from one source which is accurate except it leaves out a lot of critical info..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Papermaker85, post: 8548129, member: 572595"] that lead me to believe that carbon dating and genetic tested not nearly as advance and accurate as they claim.. looking into it they NO REAL CLUE. they are guessing at this **** and are likely wrong.. only 15% of the population or so they say IS RH negative. which if you do some research this protein is always found in our supposed ancestors.. everything I find on the subject that says there is nothing special about the RH- blood seems to come from one source which is accurate except it leaves out a lot of critical info.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Are you living in a computer simulation?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
