Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
Are Seas Reference comps really that good?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="georobu" data-source="post: 1511568" data-attributes="member: 563522"><p>I run the seas lotus reference upfront and the boston z6 for rear fill. The bostons sound like Bose compared to seas, it's like it's missing a chunk of midrange inbetween tweeter and woofer. I blame it mostly on the tweeter, I don't like it at all. The woofer is amazing, with a decent phase plug I would say they are very comparable with the seas. I ran both the boston and seas active so I can't tell you how it's going to sound with the suplied xover, probably a lot different.</p><p></p><p>Power wise, I ran 125Watts to the boston woofer and made it bottom out really easy with 80hz high pass. The Seas reference woofer is running over 250 watts same xover point and I can hardly make it bottom out, the coil overheats with continuous play however. I'd say 200 watts daily no problem though. I never ran the boston woofers with more power to test coil heat resistence but the suspension bottoms out before that.</p><p></p><p>With all this in mind, ran active the Seas are in a higher class, with the Boston woofer giving it a good run.</p><p></p><p>Instalation wise the Bostons have better options than any speaker set I've tried, it's virtually unbeatable for a clean install.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="georobu, post: 1511568, member: 563522"] I run the seas lotus reference upfront and the boston z6 for rear fill. The bostons sound like Bose compared to seas, it's like it's missing a chunk of midrange inbetween tweeter and woofer. I blame it mostly on the tweeter, I don't like it at all. The woofer is amazing, with a decent phase plug I would say they are very comparable with the seas. I ran both the boston and seas active so I can't tell you how it's going to sound with the suplied xover, probably a lot different. Power wise, I ran 125Watts to the boston woofer and made it bottom out really easy with 80hz high pass. The Seas reference woofer is running over 250 watts same xover point and I can hardly make it bottom out, the coil overheats with continuous play however. I'd say 200 watts daily no problem though. I never ran the boston woofers with more power to test coil heat resistence but the suspension bottoms out before that. With all this in mind, ran active the Seas are in a higher class, with the Boston woofer giving it a good run. Instalation wise the Bostons have better options than any speaker set I've tried, it's virtually unbeatable for a clean install. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
Are Seas Reference comps really that good?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list