Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Supergumby5000" data-source="post: 5772779" data-attributes="member: 563237">well, considering that the box above has a gross volume of 1.65cu ft without the angled part (13" depth), you can most likely net 1.2cu ft without the stupid angle.Why would you want an angled port anyways though? You want the surface area of the port to be the same throughout the length of the port, so the only spot an issue would arise would be going from a flat port wall to the angled port wall, and converting the size of the port at that spot.Any particular reason you are doing this trapezoidal?</blockquote>

Top