Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Announcement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="idiot" data-source="post: 589853" data-attributes="member: 550902"><p>I’ll get a post in before the topic is either closed or pruned.</p><p></p><p></p><p>This could be argued using semantics as a shield, however. UN Resolution 1441 never expressly condoned war as an enforcement mechanism, and so the whole of the Security Council did not endorse such an action prior to the conflict. Therefore, the war was a unilateral effort, without the UN’s backing. And so, from the UN’s perspective, it was indeed illegal. This would be an unimportant point, since the UN decries all kinds of global actions that it does not have the jurisdiction to stop, except that Bush clearly invoked Hussein’s past violations of UN resolutions as one of his initial reasons for invasion. The act of justifying the war using an organization that finds the conflict itself illegal was not one of this administration’s strongest arguments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="idiot, post: 589853, member: 550902"] I’ll get a post in before the topic is either closed or pruned. This could be argued using semantics as a shield, however. UN Resolution 1441 never expressly condoned war as an enforcement mechanism, and so the whole of the Security Council did not endorse such an action prior to the conflict. Therefore, the war was a unilateral effort, without the UN’s backing. And so, from the UN’s perspective, it was indeed illegal. This would be an unimportant point, since the UN decries all kinds of global actions that it does not have the jurisdiction to stop, except that Bush clearly invoked Hussein’s past violations of UN resolutions as one of his initial reasons for invasion. The act of justifying the war using an organization that finds the conflict itself illegal was not one of this administration’s strongest arguments. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Announcement
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
