Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Analyzing the prototype.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Papermaker85" data-source="post: 8509557" data-attributes="member: 572595"><p>In short i cant say just yet.</p><p></p><p>Im working on figuring the best configuration/materials and retesting it.. if it is an improvement over the first one it should be pretty solid. I'm trying my best to keep it affordable and realiable. The former is no doubt going to be thicker then the orginal. The gap cooling in the backplate and cooling vents in the former along with the thicker former should keep it much cooler ultimatly increasing its output and realibilty. The spaced spiders should also help avoid any mechanical issues. Which I'm not sure existed but I'm not fixing to find out 20k $ later lol.</p><p></p><p>I'm so tempted to do a carbon fiber honeycomb core sandwich cone but I don't think that maybe one Db output is worth the $200 added to the woofer.. as if stands now the mms is right at 340 grams which is about 35 grams higher than I wanted but I'm conformable with it because the cone is so **** strong and that is a real deal breaker. I'll take the 30 grams for the added stifness. Also the spacer and thicker former will add some mass. I'm expecting it to be no more than 375..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Papermaker85, post: 8509557, member: 572595"] In short i cant say just yet. Im working on figuring the best configuration/materials and retesting it.. if it is an improvement over the first one it should be pretty solid. I'm trying my best to keep it affordable and realiable. The former is no doubt going to be thicker then the orginal. The gap cooling in the backplate and cooling vents in the former along with the thicker former should keep it much cooler ultimatly increasing its output and realibilty. The spaced spiders should also help avoid any mechanical issues. Which I'm not sure existed but I'm not fixing to find out 20k $ later lol. I'm so tempted to do a carbon fiber honeycomb core sandwich cone but I don't think that maybe one Db output is worth the $200 added to the woofer.. as if stands now the mms is right at 340 grams which is about 35 grams higher than I wanted but I'm conformable with it because the cone is so **** strong and that is a real deal breaker. I'll take the 30 grams for the added stifness. Also the spacer and thicker former will add some mass. I'm expecting it to be no more than 375.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Analyzing the prototype.
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list