Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
Amp Comparison - Arc, ED, PDX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mattldm" data-source="post: 4979808" data-attributes="member: 567995"><p>I did bridge the Nine.4 and yes it had plenty of power! (probably too much if thats possible) But I wanted to have a 4 channel so I can run rear fill. With the bridged 9.4 only had two channels.</p><p></p><p>The 4.100 is PLENTY of power IMO. I know there are some that swear by 100's and 100's of watts but im totally happy with the little PDX's power (131 on the birthsheet)</p><p></p><p>Plus the overall size of the amp was important, I love how the PDX stays hidden under the seat even when its folded forward. No more amp sticking out on the floor in the extra cab area! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mattldm, post: 4979808, member: 567995"] I did bridge the Nine.4 and yes it had plenty of power! (probably too much if thats possible) But I wanted to have a 4 channel so I can run rear fill. With the bridged 9.4 only had two channels. The 4.100 is PLENTY of power IMO. I know there are some that swear by 100's and 100's of watts but im totally happy with the little PDX's power (131 on the birthsheet) Plus the overall size of the amp was important, I love how the PDX stays hidden under the seat even when its folded forward. No more amp sticking out on the floor in the extra cab area! [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
Amp Comparison - Arc, ED, PDX
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
