Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
alpine power pack for rear fill
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crsracing" data-source="post: 8701061" data-attributes="member: 678990"><p>First of all I know rear fill is controversial but this is going in a jeep that is often used off road with rear passengers. 2nd it is often used as the "camp stereo" so additional speakers are a plus.</p><p></p><p>So awhile back I bought all alpine stuff to freshen up the stereo in my jeep pdx v9, 6.5 type r components, 6.5 coaxials, and a type r 10" sub. Recently I have been researching about going active in my car and was thinking that the v9 has good enough crossovers to run my components active. Which the way a lot of people talk if I do my car I'll want to do my jeep that way to. But then I lose my channels for the rear, but I have an alpine power pack laying around. So if I bridged it and fed it decent power (not just tapped in the stereo harness like intended) would it be sufficient ? Or better yet would that set up sound better then everything fed off the v9 with the passive crossovers.</p><p></p><p>On a side note is there a down side to crossovers that just filter the tweeter and send full signal to the woofer? Like the type r ones do</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crsracing, post: 8701061, member: 678990"] First of all I know rear fill is controversial but this is going in a jeep that is often used off road with rear passengers. 2nd it is often used as the "camp stereo" so additional speakers are a plus. So awhile back I bought all alpine stuff to freshen up the stereo in my jeep pdx v9, 6.5 type r components, 6.5 coaxials, and a type r 10" sub. Recently I have been researching about going active in my car and was thinking that the v9 has good enough crossovers to run my components active. Which the way a lot of people talk if I do my car I'll want to do my jeep that way to. But then I lose my channels for the rear, but I have an alpine power pack laying around. So if I bridged it and fed it decent power (not just tapped in the stereo harness like intended) would it be sufficient ? Or better yet would that set up sound better then everything fed off the v9 with the passive crossovers. On a side note is there a down side to crossovers that just filter the tweeter and send full signal to the woofer? Like the type r ones do [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
alpine power pack for rear fill
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh