Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
alpine over pioneer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audiolife" data-source="post: 157235" data-attributes="member: 541383"><p>i was thinking of the p-99 i do believe (had single bit working as 16 bit, and also looks almost exactly the same except it has silver lighting) but the user interface between the odr and the deck you are talking about still goes through the pioneer user interface(imo sucks cause its almost as bad as using a kenwood menu). the way the odr and a few others work they hook onto a compter (in one window you have the interface (much more specific) and in the other you can have your rta . sounds like they made some improvements in that specific area with their eq however with the 31 bands and so forth so it is better than i thought but from specs i read odr is still better. whole odr line was optical not just the processors. id say what you have is about equal to what i have in relms of what you can do with it to an extent. i do like the fact you can select lower slopes but if you are doing time delays and phase shifts on purpose (using slopes) i like being able to stay in multiples of 18db at a steeper slope. basically i think it prolly would rate top 10 reading review on it as a combo.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audiolife, post: 157235, member: 541383"] i was thinking of the p-99 i do believe (had single bit working as 16 bit, and also looks almost exactly the same except it has silver lighting) but the user interface between the odr and the deck you are talking about still goes through the pioneer user interface(imo sucks cause its almost as bad as using a kenwood menu). the way the odr and a few others work they hook onto a compter (in one window you have the interface (much more specific) and in the other you can have your rta . sounds like they made some improvements in that specific area with their eq however with the 31 bands and so forth so it is better than i thought but from specs i read odr is still better. whole odr line was optical not just the processors. id say what you have is about equal to what i have in relms of what you can do with it to an extent. i do like the fact you can select lower slopes but if you are doing time delays and phase shifts on purpose (using slopes) i like being able to stay in multiples of 18db at a steeper slope. basically i think it prolly would rate top 10 reading review on it as a combo. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
alpine over pioneer
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list