Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Adire Audio is back!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hispls" data-source="post: 8651179" data-attributes="member: 614752"><p>My point is do they? And do they for an acceptable tradeoff of efficiency loss? If anything besides a 10" version of that sub is coming back with mechanical failure someone has exceeded the 1200W rating (and 1200W that you can realistically feed that coil indefinitely). Even with an 8" spider landing do you really think by the time you're nearing the point where the suspension is causing non-linearity you're going to notice?</p><p></p><p>We can only hope Wiggins had a hand in the design (including parts selection and prototype testing). If this is the case you'd have to imagine he has his reasons for not using any of those things or going for a different design. Not like shorting rings and Ti style frames didn't exist the first time he was in production so you'd have to suspect he had tested or at least considered them and ruled them out for whatever reason. It would be really nice if he were to get back active on forums and chime in on these issues. As you elude to, consumers do expect to see a lot more fancy features for 400$ price point and there certainly are plenty of new off the shelf choices for parts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hispls, post: 8651179, member: 614752"] My point is do they? And do they for an acceptable tradeoff of efficiency loss? If anything besides a 10" version of that sub is coming back with mechanical failure someone has exceeded the 1200W rating (and 1200W that you can realistically feed that coil indefinitely). Even with an 8" spider landing do you really think by the time you're nearing the point where the suspension is causing non-linearity you're going to notice? We can only hope Wiggins had a hand in the design (including parts selection and prototype testing). If this is the case you'd have to imagine he has his reasons for not using any of those things or going for a different design. Not like shorting rings and Ti style frames didn't exist the first time he was in production so you'd have to suspect he had tested or at least considered them and ruled them out for whatever reason. It would be really nice if he were to get back active on forums and chime in on these issues. As you elude to, consumers do expect to see a lot more fancy features for 400$ price point and there certainly are plenty of new off the shelf choices for parts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Adire Audio is back!
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh