Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="squeak9798" data-source="post: 587497" data-attributes="member: 555320">They are bashing the video due to the blatant inaccuracies presented in it.&nbsp; For example, the slide where it shows the &quot;Intact Windows&quot; and points them out as if they are some sort of evidence that it wasn&#039;t a plane.&nbsp; Well, the reason the windows weren&#039;t blown out was because the Pentagon was being renovated and had just had special windows installed designed to withstand blasts (they were trying to &quot;bulletproof&quot; the pentagon because they assumed in a time of heavy warfair, should it ever present itself, that the pentagon would be a target.&nbsp; And as the nations central command for the armed forces, it only makes sense that we wouldn&#039;t want it blown to pieces).BTW, I hope Josh wasn&#039;t serious about not coming back here.&nbsp; There are only a handful of people on this forum who possess more knowledge than him (myself not included in that handful).&nbsp; That&#039;s a loss of a great source of knowledge for the board.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="squeak9798, post: 587497, member: 555320"] They are bashing the video due to the blatant inaccuracies presented in it. For example, the slide where it shows the "Intact Windows" and points them out as if they are some sort of evidence that it wasn't a plane. Well, the reason the windows weren't blown out was because the Pentagon was being renovated and had just had special windows installed designed to withstand blasts (they were trying to "bulletproof" the pentagon because they assumed in a time of heavy warfair, should it ever present itself, that the pentagon would be a target. And as the nations central command for the armed forces, it only makes sense that we wouldn't want it blown to pieces). BTW, I hope Josh wasn't serious about not coming back here. There are only a handful of people on this forum who possess more knowledge than him (myself not included in that handful). That's a loss of a great source of knowledge for the board. [/QUOTE]

Verification