Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
98 WS6 ***** Am or a 98 cobra what would you take?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Diplexers" data-source="post: 719027" data-attributes="member: 550866"><p>I agree. I have been building rods with my father since I was a toddler. The number one rule for horsepower is "there is no substitute for cubic inches", bottom line. What ever you do to an engine, no matter what, another, larger engine with the same type mods WILL produce more torque and horsepower.</p><p></p><p>Now a 383 Chrysler motor compared to a Ford 389 isn't going to mean the Ford will automatically outperform the 383 because it has 6 more cubes. First thing is most the time the motor won't have its actual displacement advertised. If you do the math, surface area multiplied by the stroke, most engines aren't "right on", mainly do to marketing schemes. Second, its too close for the actual displacement to make a big difference. This is when engine design plays a bigger role in its performance.</p><p></p><p>For example: If you take the stock Chevy 454 Chevelle and pin it against a stock Plymouth 440 GTX, the GTX will undoubtedly eat the Chevelle for lunch. However once you mod both engines to death (similar mods), the Chevelle will win hands down.</p><p></p><p>As long as engines x vs engine y have the same mods, the larger will produce more power everytime.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Diplexers, post: 719027, member: 550866"] I agree. I have been building rods with my father since I was a toddler. The number one rule for horsepower is "there is no substitute for cubic inches", bottom line. What ever you do to an engine, no matter what, another, larger engine with the same type mods WILL produce more torque and horsepower. Now a 383 Chrysler motor compared to a Ford 389 isn't going to mean the Ford will automatically outperform the 383 because it has 6 more cubes. First thing is most the time the motor won't have its actual displacement advertised. If you do the math, surface area multiplied by the stroke, most engines aren't "right on", mainly do to marketing schemes. Second, its too close for the actual displacement to make a big difference. This is when engine design plays a bigger role in its performance. For example: If you take the stock Chevy 454 Chevelle and pin it against a stock Plymouth 440 GTX, the GTX will undoubtedly eat the Chevelle for lunch. However once you mod both engines to death (similar mods), the Chevelle will win hands down. As long as engines x vs engine y have the same mods, the larger will produce more power everytime. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
98 WS6 ***** Am or a 98 cobra what would you take?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list