Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
95 impala ss
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ejschultz" data-source="post: 7025666" data-attributes="member: 603800"><p>I was merely arguing for the sake of argument.I do agree with the fact that it would definitely cost more to do a good clone of an Impala. However, you're still implying that the Impala was it's own unique design from GM when in fact it was a trim level on the Caprice. Buy one, register it, and you'll see. They can be, and often are registered as Caprices. They all had the same options offered, the only difference between a B4U/LT1 Caprice and an Impala is the WX3 trim option. They had the same 4L60E ******, same LT1 engine, same B4U suspension setup, most even had the KG9 alternator, which was used primarily on 9C1 cars for the extra accessories they would run. Now, the 9C1 was a little better performance wise than a WX3. It had separate oil and ***** coolers, upgraded coolant hoses, and it had the ability to shut off the accessories when HP was needed.</p><p></p><p>Also, thanks Bad4health for sticking up for me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ejschultz, post: 7025666, member: 603800"] I was merely arguing for the sake of argument.I do agree with the fact that it would definitely cost more to do a good clone of an Impala. However, you're still implying that the Impala was it's own unique design from GM when in fact it was a trim level on the Caprice. Buy one, register it, and you'll see. They can be, and often are registered as Caprices. They all had the same options offered, the only difference between a B4U/LT1 Caprice and an Impala is the WX3 trim option. They had the same 4L60E ******, same LT1 engine, same B4U suspension setup, most even had the KG9 alternator, which was used primarily on 9C1 cars for the extra accessories they would run. Now, the 9C1 was a little better performance wise than a WX3. It had separate oil and ***** coolers, upgraded coolant hoses, and it had the ability to shut off the accessories when HP was needed. Also, thanks Bad4health for sticking up for me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
95 impala ss
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list