Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
6th order designs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JoeMama541" data-source="post: 8870365" data-attributes="member: 679628"><p>Sorry to jump in on an unrelated note but first off, assuming space wasn't a concern and SQ being the highest priority, would you run a JL w6v3 sealed or would you still port that one as well? Second, My last setup was 2 of the 10" JL w6v2's in a shared space sealed, downfiring enclosure and the volume was I think just shy of 1 cu. ft. per woofer. I loved the SQ and linear response, however the rolloff on the lower frequencies started a bit higher than I would've like. Ideally I'd like a sub/enclosure that has the same great sq and flat/even frequency response whilst keeping the output strong down to 30hz or so before any noticeable drop in output. Would you suggest a sealed enclosure at a different volume than recommended specs, a ported enclosure at either recommended or different specs, or something like a bandpass or other type of specialty design such as a T-line or something? I was planning to go with the w6v3's or the dub 7 but wasn't sure if I should go 10, 12 or 13.5 in the case of the W7. I am open to other driver suggestions as long as the SQ is on par. Also the 2 10w6v2's i had were on a slash 1000/1 and I would definitely prefer a bit more output as well this time. Thanks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JoeMama541, post: 8870365, member: 679628"] Sorry to jump in on an unrelated note but first off, assuming space wasn't a concern and SQ being the highest priority, would you run a JL w6v3 sealed or would you still port that one as well? Second, My last setup was 2 of the 10" JL w6v2's in a shared space sealed, downfiring enclosure and the volume was I think just shy of 1 cu. ft. per woofer. I loved the SQ and linear response, however the rolloff on the lower frequencies started a bit higher than I would've like. Ideally I'd like a sub/enclosure that has the same great sq and flat/even frequency response whilst keeping the output strong down to 30hz or so before any noticeable drop in output. Would you suggest a sealed enclosure at a different volume than recommended specs, a ported enclosure at either recommended or different specs, or something like a bandpass or other type of specialty design such as a T-line or something? I was planning to go with the w6v3's or the dub 7 but wasn't sure if I should go 10, 12 or 13.5 in the case of the W7. I am open to other driver suggestions as long as the SQ is on par. Also the 2 10w6v2's i had were on a slash 1000/1 and I would definitely prefer a bit more output as well this time. Thanks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
6th order designs
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh