Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Head Units
690ub or 860mp
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="zSnb" data-source="post: 2850029" data-attributes="member: 569384"><p>I agree with alot of what you said but the quality difference between 256-320kbps mp3 and CD is barely noticeable unless you are trying really hard. I have ripped copies of CD's i bought, burnt them as mp3 discs and the quailty is not different at all. Decks that have good SQ are all over the place now days. You can argue all you like about how the Nak or the Denon head units have better SQ but how come nobody can explain how their SQ is any better? The only answer I ever hear on this forum is "The Nak is made out of really high quality parts." It has barely any features, a DAC that is no better than the ones on Pioneer/Eclipse, a S/N ratio that isnt on par with Pioneer/Eclipse, and a really weak EQ.....for $600. But all that aside. I too have a hard time understanding how people spend thousands on systems that are loud as all hell and not musical at all. I consider myself to be part of the "younger" crowd of enthusiasts. I have a few friends who seem to think the whole point of after market systems is to make something that can be heard from miles away.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="zSnb, post: 2850029, member: 569384"] I agree with alot of what you said but the quality difference between 256-320kbps mp3 and CD is barely noticeable unless you are trying really hard. I have ripped copies of CD's i bought, burnt them as mp3 discs and the quailty is not different at all. Decks that have good SQ are all over the place now days. You can argue all you like about how the Nak or the Denon head units have better SQ but how come nobody can explain how their SQ is any better? The only answer I ever hear on this forum is "The Nak is made out of really high quality parts." It has barely any features, a DAC that is no better than the ones on Pioneer/Eclipse, a S/N ratio that isnt on par with Pioneer/Eclipse, and a really weak EQ.....for $600. But all that aside. I too have a hard time understanding how people spend thousands on systems that are loud as all hell and not musical at all. I consider myself to be part of the "younger" crowd of enthusiasts. I have a few friends who seem to think the whole point of after market systems is to make something that can be heard from miles away. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Head Units
690ub or 860mp
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh