Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
6.5" replacement Comps
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frankensuby" data-source="post: 2539226" data-attributes="member: 569869"><p>Bad signal? I guess 2.2v pre-outs aren't doing me any favors haha. And no, my doors are not deadened yet, but I ran a spacer and sealed with modeling clay for density and sound. Admittedly it helped.</p><p></p><p>The reason why I like the Polks much more than the R's is i demoed them side by side at tweeter, off of my current deck with desired settings, and through the same speaker amp at 75 RMS (don't know what the gain was, but that isn't the point) and the Polks just blew the R's away. Unfortunately I demoed after I bought the R's haha.</p><p></p><p>Anyways, I tuned several times for audible distortion, and when I tuned it down, the speakers did better, BUT, they were much more quieter. I'm comparing the sound to my GF's system which is a Power Acoustik at 35 RMS x 4, and it sounds as loud before distortion as the audiobahn without the distortion. This is all at flatline EQ's and BB off, everything. I followed JL's tutorial for tuning.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frankensuby, post: 2539226, member: 569869"] Bad signal? I guess 2.2v pre-outs aren't doing me any favors haha. And no, my doors are not deadened yet, but I ran a spacer and sealed with modeling clay for density and sound. Admittedly it helped. The reason why I like the Polks much more than the R's is i demoed them side by side at tweeter, off of my current deck with desired settings, and through the same speaker amp at 75 RMS (don't know what the gain was, but that isn't the point) and the Polks just blew the R's away. Unfortunately I demoed after I bought the R's haha. Anyways, I tuned several times for audible distortion, and when I tuned it down, the speakers did better, BUT, they were much more quieter. I'm comparing the sound to my GF's system which is a Power Acoustik at 35 RMS x 4, and it sounds as loud before distortion as the audiobahn without the distortion. This is all at flatline EQ's and BB off, everything. I followed JL's tutorial for tuning. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
6.5" replacement Comps
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list