Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
4 si mags sealed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Electrodynamic" data-source="post: 5781869" data-attributes="member: 548723"><p>From what I've seen, the SQ crowd likes the v4 a lot more than they did the v3. It's holding its own over on DIYMA and EMSQ very well...and it's got some tough competition over there. A member of diyma recently compared the v4 to his Esotar and a few others and said this:</p><p></p><p></p><p>I take it that you've heard both the v4 and the v3? IMO, the v4 is a huge improvement in the SQ department over the v3. However, the drawback to the improved sound quality, smaller enclosure, shallower mounting depth, and lower power requirements, is the sealed-only application. On this board a sealed-only driver isn't going to go over very well because a lot of people on here love their SPL too much. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif The v4's aren't as loud as the v3's because, well, they can't be ported. Nor will they take 1300+ watts. But neither of the latter dictates a better sounding driver.</p><p></p><p>*edit* I'm not saying that the v3's weren't good subwoofers, they were really great for moderate-sized ported enclosures and they would handle a lot of power. The 12's were my personal favorite for car use, but I liked (and still use) the 15's for home theater applications.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Electrodynamic, post: 5781869, member: 548723"] From what I've seen, the SQ crowd likes the v4 a lot more than they did the v3. It's holding its own over on DIYMA and EMSQ very well...and it's got some tough competition over there. A member of diyma recently compared the v4 to his Esotar and a few others and said this: I take it that you've heard both the v4 and the v3? IMO, the v4 is a huge improvement in the SQ department over the v3. However, the drawback to the improved sound quality, smaller enclosure, shallower mounting depth, and lower power requirements, is the sealed-only application. On this board a sealed-only driver isn't going to go over very well because a lot of people on here love their SPL too much. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] The v4's aren't as loud as the v3's because, well, they can't be ported. Nor will they take 1300+ watts. But neither of the latter dictates a better sounding driver. *edit* I'm not saying that the v3's weren't good subwoofers, they were really great for moderate-sized ported enclosures and they would handle a lot of power. The 12's were my personal favorite for car use, but I liked (and still use) the 15's for home theater applications. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
4 si mags sealed
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list