Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Builds
Car Audio Build Logs
4-DD515, DD M1c, 2005 Denali
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Canaan" data-source="post: 8241603" data-attributes="member: 566706"><p>I know this port looks HUGE, but it was actually 196sq inches of port area for at 14.5cuft (net) box.</p><p></p><p>So the port area per cubic foot was just 13.5sq/cuft.!!!</p><p></p><p>But, this is a 4-DD 515 build with only 1500wrms. Port noise will NEVER HAPPEN at that level of cone displacement.</p><p></p><p>The actual 'on paper' numbers for this build were ~14.5cuft @ 38hz. But 'in-cabin' tuning changes alot with big box builds, and I accounted for that change in my design (port firing into the back hatch and the distance to the listening position)</p><p></p><p>This box build is heavily braced...and I offered the owner the chance to replace the subs, add batts, alts, and a second DD M1c....to get louder.</p><p></p><p>I just have to say, the owner of this vehicle was stunned after hearing what he had purchased.</p><p></p><p>I wish I had taken a vid of his reaction....if the owner drops by soon, I will video his review for this install.</p><p></p><p>also...round ports are more efficient.</p><p></p><p>Slot-vents are ok, but a round vent is the most efficient vent (for tuning).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Canaan, post: 8241603, member: 566706"] I know this port looks HUGE, but it was actually 196sq inches of port area for at 14.5cuft (net) box. So the port area per cubic foot was just 13.5sq/cuft.!!! But, this is a 4-DD 515 build with only 1500wrms. Port noise will NEVER HAPPEN at that level of cone displacement. The actual 'on paper' numbers for this build were ~14.5cuft @ 38hz. But 'in-cabin' tuning changes alot with big box builds, and I accounted for that change in my design (port firing into the back hatch and the distance to the listening position) This box build is heavily braced...and I offered the owner the chance to replace the subs, add batts, alts, and a second DD M1c....to get louder. I just have to say, the owner of this vehicle was stunned after hearing what he had purchased. I wish I had taken a vid of his reaction....if the owner drops by soon, I will video his review for this install. also...round ports are more efficient. Slot-vents are ok, but a round vent is the most efficient vent (for tuning). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Builds
Car Audio Build Logs
4-DD515, DD M1c, 2005 Denali
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list