Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
2nd ported box build
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Moble Enclosurs" data-source="post: 7630537" data-attributes="member: 634917"><p>well wouldn't you like to know...lol j/k. No seriously though, the specs ARE the response in this case. Because they were calculated on physical and acoustical limitations to control the subwoofer at it best operating capabilities. It has nothing to do with personal preference in the specs you pointed out. It is a way to configure proper response from the sub and box only, and is only based on a bass reflex idea as of now.</p><p></p><p>Each design will have its own specs and that is even true for compression, though a lot of people believe that is solely based on VAS figures. Though this is one factor that is parallel in calculations, it is not the only determining one.</p><p></p><p>Map the specs out on a program and see what it shows. Idk what it would come up with yet because not everything has been calculated for as of this time. So, even those recommendations that I mention can be changes for personal preference.</p><p></p><p>The The thing about my recommendations that people need to understand is that these are for response calculations only as of now. Tweaks can be made to fit your lifestyle of musical choice any way you choose. Nothing says you cannot tune these to say, 26Hz and not be fine with that. But for what I figure, it is the best starting point of optimum operation of the subs of choice in whatever box I calculate for. Too many variables exist that make these recommendations solid for everyone. But I can guarantee that efficiency is going to be increased, and musicality will be amount its best in any of my figures, regardless of how low you personally want to go.</p><p></p><p>When I design, I use these calculation I have come up with as either a definite, depending on how it matches your taste and limits, or I change it a bit to better the transience of the response for a more natural output. There are likely always going to be minor changes in any design to customize it to your liking because, as we all know very well at this point, everyone's will be slightly different as a majority.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Moble Enclosurs, post: 7630537, member: 634917"] well wouldn't you like to know...lol j/k. No seriously though, the specs ARE the response in this case. Because they were calculated on physical and acoustical limitations to control the subwoofer at it best operating capabilities. It has nothing to do with personal preference in the specs you pointed out. It is a way to configure proper response from the sub and box only, and is only based on a bass reflex idea as of now. Each design will have its own specs and that is even true for compression, though a lot of people believe that is solely based on VAS figures. Though this is one factor that is parallel in calculations, it is not the only determining one. Map the specs out on a program and see what it shows. Idk what it would come up with yet because not everything has been calculated for as of this time. So, even those recommendations that I mention can be changes for personal preference. The The thing about my recommendations that people need to understand is that these are for response calculations only as of now. Tweaks can be made to fit your lifestyle of musical choice any way you choose. Nothing says you cannot tune these to say, 26Hz and not be fine with that. But for what I figure, it is the best starting point of optimum operation of the subs of choice in whatever box I calculate for. Too many variables exist that make these recommendations solid for everyone. But I can guarantee that efficiency is going to be increased, and musicality will be amount its best in any of my figures, regardless of how low you personally want to go. When I design, I use these calculation I have come up with as either a definite, depending on how it matches your taste and limits, or I change it a bit to better the transience of the response for a more natural output. There are likely always going to be minor changes in any design to customize it to your liking because, as we all know very well at this point, everyone's will be slightly different as a majority. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
2nd ported box build
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh