Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Builds
Car Audio Build Logs
2018 Toyota Sienna minivan with 2 DB4515R on 2 Taramps Smart 8 Bass
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buck" data-source="post: 8913676" data-attributes="member: 591582"><p>I've never played with it myself, but in ported boxes with at least one other customer I had I've noticed they had problems running inverted, lower output/worse bandwidth some. There's no way the back of the cone radiates better than the front, with the front being a consistently shaped surface, so like the back of the cone might not work as well as radiating surface into the cabin like the front would, where maybe the back of the cone would pressurize the box perfectly fine. That is something I've thought about but can't really test myself- the front of the cone has to be a better radiating area, maybe what you'd want to fire into the cabin, where the back of the cone is perfectly fine to pressurize the already high pressure box, where the cabin is harder to pressure so maybe front cone would work better to pair with cabin for coupling/radiating surface reasons. Just a rough thought, not sure if it'd work out that way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buck, post: 8913676, member: 591582"] I've never played with it myself, but in ported boxes with at least one other customer I had I've noticed they had problems running inverted, lower output/worse bandwidth some. There's no way the back of the cone radiates better than the front, with the front being a consistently shaped surface, so like the back of the cone might not work as well as radiating surface into the cabin like the front would, where maybe the back of the cone would pressurize the box perfectly fine. That is something I've thought about but can't really test myself- the front of the cone has to be a better radiating area, maybe what you'd want to fire into the cabin, where the back of the cone is perfectly fine to pressurize the already high pressure box, where the cabin is harder to pressure so maybe front cone would work better to pair with cabin for coupling/radiating surface reasons. Just a rough thought, not sure if it'd work out that way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Builds
Car Audio Build Logs
2018 Toyota Sienna minivan with 2 DB4515R on 2 Taramps Smart 8 Bass
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list