Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Doxquzme" data-source="post: 8908414" data-attributes="member: 689267">CDT&#039;s have a great rep from many years of hobbyist using them. The fact that they are doing as well as they are and that it was all done by word of mouth is a testament to the products quality.You cannot EQ out sound signatures, characteristics, nor can you EQ out environmental aspects of the build. That&#039;s where DSP is beneficial. measuring a response in any environment is crucial to knowing where to start.You have to see what you&#039;re hearing in order to address any anomalies, that is to get to the next level sound, with the Recoil or any other amp.All the CDT&#039;s I&#039;ve ever used have been decent, some exceptional in timbre and SQ. DSP is about the only way to tame nulls and peaks, EQ&#039;s don’t address that at all.It&#039;s like using the treble/mid/bass adjustments on a head unit. You&#039;re not really addressing any issue unless you can see it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Doxquzme, post: 8908414, member: 689267"] CDT's have a great rep from many years of hobbyist using them. The fact that they are doing as well as they are and that it was all done by word of mouth is a testament to the products quality. You cannot EQ out sound signatures, characteristics, nor can you EQ out environmental aspects of the build. That's where DSP is beneficial. measuring a response in any environment is crucial to knowing where to start. You have to see what you're hearing in order to address any anomalies, that is to get to the next level sound, with the Recoil or any other amp. All the CDT's I've ever used have been decent, some exceptional in timbre and SQ. DSP is about the only way to tame nulls and peaks, EQ's don’t address that at all. It's like using the treble/mid/bass adjustments on a head unit. You're not really addressing any issue unless you can see it. [/QUOTE]

Verification