Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
18" sub with small space requirements
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 2823653" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>Yes, you are right cone size is not the factor. That was not my intended point, displacement was. The louder you wanna be, the more air you are gonna need to displace. Cone diameter is merely one variable of that equation, cone excursion and enclosure efficiency are the others (basically).</p><p></p><p>Say you buy this super duper sub that has the potential to move tons of air (either by massive excursion, or by raw power handling while playing at or near tuning where enclosure efficiency kicks in), but your space is so limited you must put a small port (cross section) in it... are you gonna get great performance over all?</p><p></p><p>If your sub works well in a small box, and has good low end, it must be inefficient... Hoffman's Iron Law and all that. Personally, Id rather have an efficient setup I dont have to throw gobs of power at to perform well down low, if I was getting an 18. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 2823653, member: 549629"] Yes, you are right cone size is not the factor. That was not my intended point, displacement was. The louder you wanna be, the more air you are gonna need to displace. Cone diameter is merely one variable of that equation, cone excursion and enclosure efficiency are the others (basically). Say you buy this super duper sub that has the potential to move tons of air (either by massive excursion, or by raw power handling while playing at or near tuning where enclosure efficiency kicks in), but your space is so limited you must put a small port (cross section) in it... are you gonna get great performance over all? If your sub works well in a small box, and has good low end, it must be inefficient... Hoffman's Iron Law and all that. Personally, Id rather have an efficient setup I dont have to throw gobs of power at to perform well down low, if I was getting an 18. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG][IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
18" sub with small space requirements
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list