Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
$150 to spend
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="denim" data-source="post: 7248920" data-attributes="member: 545441"><p><strong>I don't think anyone is bashing the SQ people, heck I thought I was one. I think part of the distinction here is, to the human ear, there can be friendly and unfriendly distortion. Many people like a little bit of 4th order harmonic distortion. Yes, I agree, the lower the overall distortion the better, and I was not really defending my products, more or less just that I am flat out sick of the one sided belief of no exotic motor structure = no good for SQ. That is usually predicated over and over at DIYma. That is why I joined in on the conversation, meaning the sweeping unsupported generalization made about our drivers. </strong>//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif<strong> As for the Q and Icon, two different drivers that are in sort of the same class, but do different things for different installs. And for the record, I don't make tons of money, if I did, I would not be working 2 full time jobs. </strong>//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="denim, post: 7248920, member: 545441"] [B]I don't think anyone is bashing the SQ people, heck I thought I was one. I think part of the distinction here is, to the human ear, there can be friendly and unfriendly distortion. Many people like a little bit of 4th order harmonic distortion. Yes, I agree, the lower the overall distortion the better, and I was not really defending my products, more or less just that I am flat out sick of the one sided belief of no exotic motor structure = no good for SQ. That is usually predicated over and over at DIYma. That is why I joined in on the conversation, meaning the sweeping unsupported generalization made about our drivers. [/B][IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG][B] As for the Q and Icon, two different drivers that are in sort of the same class, but do different things for different installs. And for the record, I don't make tons of money, if I did, I would not be working 2 full time jobs. [/B][IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG][B] [/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
$150 to spend
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list