Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
138.8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Moble Enclosurs" data-source="post: 7757499" data-attributes="member: 634917"><p>Another blog next week lol. But if you use the port constants of area and length the same response with minor differences can be achievable. The great thing about common chambers is the ability to utilize the space more efficiently in some cases, though having extra support in the design from the separate chambers is a great addition. having separate chambers will likely require the use of more than one port and if you revert to aeroports, and the design requires a 90 phase shift, you may limit the length ability to keep tuning lower. So, both have advantages and disadvantages, MAINLY physical. Acoustically, you can get similar results from both depending on how you work the design. Just a quick thought.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Moble Enclosurs, post: 7757499, member: 634917"] Another blog next week lol. But if you use the port constants of area and length the same response with minor differences can be achievable. The great thing about common chambers is the ability to utilize the space more efficiently in some cases, though having extra support in the design from the separate chambers is a great addition. having separate chambers will likely require the use of more than one port and if you revert to aeroports, and the design requires a 90 phase shift, you may limit the length ability to keep tuning lower. So, both have advantages and disadvantages, MAINLY physical. Acoustically, you can get similar results from both depending on how you work the design. Just a quick thought. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
138.8
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list