Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="LilBassGuy" data-source="post: 1804950" data-attributes="member: 568000">according to the ID website it seems as tho your enclosure should be anywhere between .55 cubic feet and 1.00 cubic feet, so your .701 should be fine unless you want to lower the f3 of the system (let it hit lower notes) by building it a little bigger...as for the subs displacement, you DO want to add that into your total box volume because after you install the sub, the enclosure has become that much smaller (in other words, if you built a box to be exactly .700 cubic feet, after the sub is installed there would only be .63 cubic feet of air that the sub can work with)...therefore, building a bigger box, one that is around .707 cubic feet, would allow the sub to still have its .7 cubic feet of air to work with, which is what you wantstill, the sub would do fine with .63 cubic feet, it just depends on how big you want the box and how deep you want your bass</blockquote>

[QUOTE="LilBassGuy, post: 1804950, member: 568000"] according to the ID website it seems as tho your enclosure should be anywhere between .55 cubic feet and 1.00 cubic feet, so your .701 should be fine unless you want to lower the f3 of the system (let it hit lower notes) by building it a little bigger... as for the subs displacement, you DO want to add that into your total box volume because after you install the sub, the enclosure has become that much smaller (in other words, if you built a box to be exactly .700 cubic feet, after the sub is installed there would only be .63 cubic feet of air that the sub can work with)...therefore, building a bigger box, one that is around .707 cubic feet, would allow the sub to still have its .7 cubic feet of air to work with, which is what you want still, the sub would do fine with .63 cubic feet, it just depends on how big you want the box and how deep you want your bass [/QUOTE]

Verification