Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Car Audio Build Logs
01 Explorer Tiny DD setup to (2) 18 AT Stratos in a 4th
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="4bannger" data-source="post: 8249957" data-attributes="member: 646021"><p>[quote name='slammedincouch']Thanks man- i don&#39;t think I&#39;ll ever be finished with it haha</p><p></p><p> [USER=591582]@Buck[/USER] is definitely the best person to ask, but from what I recall, they have a little efficiency over 4ths, but you also have a larger phase shift with 6th orders and sacrifice some of the transient response on the lower frequencies...</p><p></p><p>Main reason I went with a 6th over a 4th really just had to do with the driver. I wanted to test out another 4th, but when I looked at the t/s for the 9012, it was 100% suited for a 6th. Might go back to a 4th with the m3 8s once I get them reconed to d4s</p></blockquote><p></p><p>That&#39;s was helpful. I guess I&#39;ll stay away from 6th orders for now. I really like the lows. It&#39;s one thing I think my 4th order is lacking. I have it tuned to 40 hz and it&#39;s a 1:1 with 8cuft sealed and 8 cuft ported. You think I would be better off spl wise to go with a nice ported box with good port area and tuned around 34 hz? I like the lows but don&#39;t wanna loose the higher end bass. </p><p></p><p>Also. How much port area per cuft would be good for 2 type r 15&#39;s</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="4bannger, post: 8249957, member: 646021"] [quote name='slammedincouch']Thanks man- i don't think I'll ever be finished with it haha [USER=591582]@Buck[/USER] is definitely the best person to ask, but from what I recall, they have a little efficiency over 4ths, but you also have a larger phase shift with 6th orders and sacrifice some of the transient response on the lower frequencies... Main reason I went with a 6th over a 4th really just had to do with the driver. I wanted to test out another 4th, but when I looked at the t/s for the 9012, it was 100% suited for a 6th. Might go back to a 4th with the m3 8s once I get them reconed to d4s[/QUOTE] That's was helpful. I guess I'll stay away from 6th orders for now. I really like the lows. It's one thing I think my 4th order is lacking. I have it tuned to 40 hz and it's a 1:1 with 8cuft sealed and 8 cuft ported. You think I would be better off spl wise to go with a nice ported box with good port area and tuned around 34 hz? I like the lows but don't wanna loose the higher end bass. Also. How much port area per cuft would be good for 2 type r 15's [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Car Audio Build Logs
01 Explorer Tiny DD setup to (2) 18 AT Stratos in a 4th
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh