Recent content by TtownCLS

Testing. Plain as that. When the season was over, I went looking for a sub that played more accurately below 20hz. I won a world championship in MECA, but the weak point all season was sub bass scores. IASCA has a track on their CD that has real 18hz bass on it. It's hard to pick up even one...

Mine are dual 4 ohm I thought so. I initially tested one Flatlyne 12 in place of the two IDQV3's. The flatlyne was more accurate, and had more detail. The bass was clean even at low volume. It just sounds more natural to me. So if one is good, two is even better. Some people just like to be...

I'm partial to the IB setup for the lowest extension possible, and no loss of trunk space. I have no doubt they would work well in other enclosures as long as the enclosure is built to specs. I think a few went out and bought one. That's one nice vacuum That's the point I was getting at. I...

I am running 2 Flatlyne 12's in an Infinite Baffle setup. The trunk is completely isolated from the cabin and is vented to the outside through two vents in each corner of the trunk. I actually broke several welds on the trunk hinges with the Flatlynes during testing. I have turned the levels...

MECA World champion 2008 SQ Undefeated amateur 2008 MECA SQ MECA SQ Rookie of the year 2nd IASCA International North American Championship http://www.mecacaraudio.com/2008finals/ MECA The Flatlyne subs are in the process of integration. They have more output than what I'm accustomed to. I...

I would love to know where you heard the Flatlyne 10's. I ran IDQ12V3's last season in a SQ system. I changed the subs this season to the Flatlyne 12's. They are the most accurate, detailed sub I've ever heard. The ID's won me a world championship last season, and I didn't hesitate to replace...