Recent content by goldway

That's very detailed. i was followed. My midbass improved alot now. And i am happy with bi-amp now. thanks again.

Hey Here-I-Come. Thanks for your detailed reply. Am i right to say that, if i just bi-wired/bi-amp set up for my system, even throught its semi-passive setup. if i stuy on tuning deeply. it could archive same result as Full Active setup w/o crossover compents. Or someway is easier to archive...

That's good suggtion. i do not think i could tune system much better than Hertz engineer does. i should call bi-amp to semi-passive now. maybe its good solution for MLK165 owners.

Make sense. they want to protect speakers. then i should be able to use Vrx2.150 to run active. amp output 110rms per channel only. MLK165 allow 150rms per channel. thanks

em. but i did not see the benefits here, if you could run full two way active without using passive crossover, should be able to archive same result. come back to my question now, bi-amp or Active..which is better？

Agree, Hertz suggested to use their crossover. That configure as bi-amp. but if we have HU like Alpine 9887 which we could run full active. compare with Hertz bi-amp(still passive)? which is the best way? bi-amp or active? the advantages of passive biamping are much the same as the advantages...

Hey. i do agree with you, i also searched all over the world. Active setup need not corssover compents. but think with MLK165 , we could run three types crossover. 1.Passive crossover 2.Active without crossover 3.bi-amp I am not which method is best, as now i already get two units of...

Thanks for both reply, am i correct t say bi amping means passive? the reason why i was confused. My installer tell me if i wanna run active with Hertz Mille MLK 165 Comp Speakers(which come with ML28,MLK165 and MLCK20). I will need crossover box(MLCK20) for better perfermance. and MLCK20...

Anyone could advise on "What is different with bi amping or active?" i was confused if my system runing active or passive now.

im using alpine 9887 now. FM radio reception is poor compare with my old Kenwood . but i feel sound quality is better compare 9887 with old kenwood.

To share with my setup. I was run MLK165 with Lrx2.9 which give 280w per channel. midbass is strong. passive setup. Now changed to two unit of Vrx2.150 seems..less midbass. Vrx2.150 only give 110w per channel. Maybe Vrx2.250 is right choice for MLK165, to archive sound clearity and better...

MLK165 are very good, midbass and tweeters..

Hi i have follow setup. and plan to run two way active. Alpine 9887 + iPOD cable +iPOD Photo 60G Audison Vrx 2.150 CS Audison Vrx 2.150.2 EX CS Hertz Mille MLK 165 Comp Speakers i have two questions here. 1.i use Vrx2.150.2 to power tweeter ML28, use Vrx2.150 to power MLK165 mids. Are...