Current events discussion

Not much on real science, huh?
More about fantasy energy beings and pyramid power bullshit.

"So what does this mean for orbiting astronauts? In space, astronauts and their spaceship still have mass and are still acted upon by Earth’s gravity. In this sense, they still have weight, even though Earth’s gravitational force is smaller in orbit than it is on Earth’s surface (Box 1). However, they do not feel their weight because nothing is pushing back on them. In essence, the ground has disappeared from beneath them, and both the astronauts and spaceship are falling (Figure 1B).

Wait, so weightlessness is just free fall? Yes. "


You know...Harvard.
1. That's orbiting astronauts and not generalized everything in space.

2. What you said still doesn't make sense. You might be able to find a quote, but the way you said it makes no sense.
 
What's really ironic, the dems are out there telling everyone that the republicans are trying to take aware our democracy when they are the one trying to remove a candidate, from the ballots, for a crime he was never committed of doing.

Now, I would like to hear a democrat admit the dems are wrong for trying to take Trump off the ballot due to reasons that Trump has never been convicted of in court.
That raises a good question. Is the process dependent on a conviction?

If it is, then they shouldn't have tried.

What is the precedent on the process? When was the last time this happened?
 
1. That's orbiting astronauts and not generalized everything in space.

2. What you said still doesn't make sense. You might be able to find a quote, but the way you said it makes no sense.
1. Incorrect. It's any object in space.

2. Your failure to understand something so basic does not mean that it doesn't make sense.
 
What's really ironic, the dems are out there telling everyone that the republicans are trying to take aware our democracy when they are the one trying to remove a candidate, from the ballots, for a crime he was never committed of doing.

Now, I would like to hear a democrat admit the dems are wrong for trying to take Trump off the ballot due to reasons that Trump has never been convicted of in court.
Pretty stupid case and waste of time and money. Ironically, I'm looking at my Colorado ballot and they left Trump on it anyway because they knew they were going to lose. The Georgia case (which I consider legitimate) has been jeopardized by Fani Willis.
 
Pretty stupid case and waste of time and money. Ironically, I'm looking at my Colorado ballot and they left Trump on it anyway because they knew they were going to lose. The Georgia case (which I consider legitimate) has been jeopardized by Fani Willis.
Well the presidential election is a federal election so individual states should not be allowed to just say hey, this person can't be a part of this election. They have already agreed to be a part of the process.

 
Last edited:
That raises a good question. Is the process dependent on a conviction?

If it is, then they shouldn't have tried.

What is the precedent on the process? When was the last time this happened?

Punishment should be dependent upon a conviction. We just had a City Council member where I live, comment some pretty bad crimes. There was proof where he was actually caught on film along with being arrested while at the place he shouldn't have been. The top officials were brought in to discuss what we should do with seat. I was one of the ones that voted he should keep it until the court verdict because he claimed to be innocent, so we can't claim he is guilty until the court states it. Most of agreed, so he was kept as a council member until the court actually convicted him. On thing you should know is, I really despised the guy. Like, I really hated this guy.
 
Punishment should be dependent upon a conviction. We just had a City Council member where I live, comment some pretty bad crimes. There was proof where he was actually caught on film along with being arrested while at the place he shouldn't have been. The top officials were brought in to discuss what we should do with seat. I was one of the ones that voted he should keep it until the court verdict because he claimed to be innocent, so we can't claim he is guilty until the court states it. Most of agreed, so he was kept as a council member until the court actually convicted him. On thing you should know is, I really despised the guy. Like, I really hated this guy.
So there was no precedent, no state law in place, no local regulations.
You had to vote to figure out what to do.
And you did.
 
Last edited:
"First brother Jim Biden told Congress last week that Hunter Biden held a previously undisclosed meeting with Patrick Ho, an executive with Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC China Energy - which, weeks earlier, paid Hunter and Jim Biden $5 million as part of a joint venture to find investments for the Chinese firm, the Washington Free Beacon reports.

Hunter had previously referred to Ho as "the ******* spy chief of China" in an audio recording..."

😳

 

IMG_5709.gif


Your replacements are here. Wonder what's gonna happen to all the people who have no use anymore...
 
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,900
Views
471,877
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top