What is?

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

Back when fauci said you could catch it the breakfast table

Oh monkey pox

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Depends on the big picture.
If it results in a net gain, so be it. Like paying a professional fundraiser big bucks, resulting in better fundraising than the low-budget one.

So you're OK with hypocrites telling you what to do then...

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

So you're OK with hypocrites telling you what to do then...

Well, he’s hypocrite, too, so…clowns of a feather honk together

 

[djdilliodon!]

Kinda like all the millionaire environmentalists flying private jets telling everyone else how bad they are

My favorite is in the 1970’s it was “global cooling”. They wanted to nuke the ice caps . Then it was oh no global warming. Now it’s “climate change”. It’s all about that $$$. When the federal government pays billions to scientists to not come up with 100% facts but educated guesses which they have always been wrong, they are gonna say whatever is necessary to always make those guesses keep them on the pay roll. What’s the new thing wanna do, block the sun, that is exactly their new idea and I’m not kidding . What I find hilarious is that we have had period on earth much hotter then now. Maybe the climate changes naturally

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

My favorite is in the 1970’s it was “global cooling”. They wanted to nuke the ice caps . Then it was oh no global warming. Now it’s “climate change”. It’s all about that $$$. When the federal government pays billions to scientists to not come up with 100% facts but educated guesses which they have always been wrong, they are gonna say whatever is necessary to always make those guesses keep them on the pay roll. What’s the new thing wanna do, block the sun, that is exactly their new idea and I’m not kidding . What I find hilarious is that we have had period on earth much hotter then now. Maybe the climate changes naturally

It’s so stupid how they’ve built a negative connotation around the words “climate change.” Wtf? When has the climate ever not changed? What are we gonna do, like are we gonna just freeze the movement of the entire universe in place so the climate doesn’t change? Climate change is so damn vague; it’s a nonsensical label.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So you're OK with hypocrites telling you what to do then...

How are they a hypocrite if they are achieving a net gain?
Big picture.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Well, he’s hypocrite, too, so…clowns of a feather honk together

Mmm hmm, says the guy sitting in his bed being supported by the gubment, telling us all how much he hates the gubment.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Mmm hmm, says the guy sitting in his bed being supported by the gubment, telling us all how much he hates the gubment.

Lol, once again, you wish you knew what you were talking about

I found your theme song, Rob:

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Lol, once again, you wish you knew what you were talking about

I found your theme song, Rob:

Yo ain't a trust fund kid, and you don't live with mom and dad. You have no job, and you didn't work enough to have retirement. So, you must be supported by the gubment.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Yo ain't a trust fund kid, and you don't live with mom and dad. You have no job, and you didn't work enough to have retirement. So, you must be supported by the gubment.

With how lame and pointless your posts are, you must have a floppy wiener

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

My favorite is in the 1970’s it was “global cooling”. They wanted to nuke the ice caps . Then it was oh no global warming. Now it’s “climate change”. It’s all about that $$$. When the federal government pays billions to scientists to not come up with 100% facts but educated guesses which they have always been wrong, they are gonna say whatever is necessary to always make those guesses keep them on the pay roll. What’s the new thing wanna do, block the sun, that is exactly their new idea and I’m not kidding . What I find hilarious is that we have had period on earth much hotter then now. Maybe the climate changes naturally

Except that wasn't the case.

THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GLOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS

Climate science as we know it today did not exist in the 1960s and 1970s. The integrated enterprise embodied in the Nobel Prizewinning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change existed then as separate threads of research pursued by isolated groups of scientists. Atmospheric chemists...

journals.ametsoc.org

"A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales."

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

With how lame and pointless your posts are, you must have a floppy wiener

That's pretty powerful stuff there. Did you write it, or your PCA?
(You know, your non-lame and non-pointless South Park YoutTube link)

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

What I often notice is that they pick and choose the parts of the Bible that support the narrative that they are pushing at any particular moment.
God hates homosexuals, so they should die. God also said you should not wear mixed fabrics, but that rule isn't so important.
God says you should not kill, but it's OK if you are killing to promote your god or your cause (pro-life).
God says you should not be greedy, but it's OK to be a preacher and beg the flock to pay for your second jet, or so you can buy radio stations, or hookers.
God wants you to keep holy the Sabbath. Unless the game is on at the same time.

View attachment 50622

They seem to intermix the Old Testament God with the New Testament God as well. They don't seem to understand that God changes with the advent of Christ. Ironically that makes God a progressive, which would piss off the Christian Conservatives if they ever engaged their brains.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Kinda like all the millionaire environmentalists flying private jets telling everyone else how bad they are

There's plenty of hypocrisy to go around.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Except that wasn't the case.

THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GLOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS

Climate science as we know it today did not exist in the 1960s and 1970s. The integrated enterprise embodied in the Nobel Prizewinning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change existed then as separate threads of research pursued by isolated groups of scientists. Atmospheric chemists...

journals.ametsoc.org

"A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales."

Ah, yes, you believe in the same bogus science that ran a fear campaign for global cooling as a credible source or foundation for global warming? Global warming dominated their minds so much that they all said global cooling was coming! Lol!

Oh, I’m totally sure they’re correct on their info now