Ask Rob, he is the one drawing these conclusions while not admitting that he isn't quoting shit verbatim.I'm confused are "they" manipulating numbers to make blue states appear red or not?
Now dumbasss, show us where it says "they are" doing anything.SHOW US THE WORDS I CHANGED.
Yet another false claim you’ve made. Thats 45 on my list.
View attachment 47557
Thxone will lie in order to claim his lies are truths.
Go figure.
Soaked in vodka and living the taker life in a taker state.
Now you will spin it and say this is what you were quoting the whole time right? You liar.SHOW US THE WORDS I CHANGED.
Yet another false claim you’ve made. Thats 45 on my list.
View attachment 47557
Thxone will lie in order to claim his lies are truths.
Go figure.
Soaked in vodka and living the taker life in a taker state.
If the numbers are being "fiddled" or "messed" with, it is being done by someone.Now dumbasss, show us where it says "they are" doing anything.
YOU claimed I changed your words. Now provide proof of that claim.Now you will spin it and say this is what you were quoting the whole time right? You liar.
What Rob says or thinks is what Rob says/thinks. Are you saying the numbers are somehow being manipulated to make blue states look red? That appears to what he thinks you think, but what do you actually think?Ask Rob, he is the one drawing these conclusions while not admitting that he isn't quoting shit verbatim.
You are arguing something that hasn't happened. Nobody said numbers are being messed with. You keep saying that over and over. You are fucking retarded.If the numbers are being "fiddled" or "messed" with, it is being done by someone.
It is common to refer to an unknown person or personS as "they".
If it is not a person who is fiddling with or messing with the numbers, how is it happening?
Robots? Computers? There would have to be a "they" programming these devices.
So, how is this fiddling happening?
You are lying again.YOU claimed I changed your words. Now provide proof of that claim.
Funny how you make SO many claims, but cannot prove them.
SHOW US WHERE I CHANGED YOUR WORDS IN MY QUOTES OR IN MY SCREENSHOTS.
It appears that way to Rob because he is Stupid with a capitol S. I didn't say numbers ARE being fiddled with. I insinuated that they COULD be fiddled with. You know, reading and comprehension was taught pretty early in school and the more I deal with Rob the more I realize some people are just given jobs, no skills required.What Rob says or thinks is what Rob says/thinks. Are you saying the numbers are somehow being manipulated to make blue states look red? That appears to what he thinks you think, but what do you actually think?
You keep saying my quotes and screenshots of your wrods are not verbatim, yet you cannot offer any examples where I modified your words or the screenshots so that they are not verbatim.You are lying again.
You said you quoted me VERBATIM. I showed that you did not. You lied. Now you are posting a different quote and are trying to distract or confuse people by using a different quote/screen capture.
Stick to fetching coffee boy.
How many times do you need to see it????? Damn you ARE stupid!!You keep saying my quotes and screenshots of your wrods are not verbatim, yet you cannot offer any examples where I modified your words or the screenshots so that they are not verbatim.
PLEASE SHOW US AN EXAMPLE OF WHERE I CHANGED YOUR WORDS IN A QUOTE OR MODIFIED A SCREENSHOT TO ALTER YOUR WORDS.
We are waiting.
If you cannot offer an example, then your claim is considered bullshit.
Tell us how I altered this image:
View attachment 47560
Tell us you never posted this sentence: "THOSE numbers can't be fiddled with to get the result needed for an agenda."
Tell us whether you think states' political leanings are accurately represented or if the numbers have been "fiddled" with to change the representation.
If the above sentence quoted VERBATIM is not sarcasm, tell us why you posted it when no one asked about it, and no one was discussing if the division of red/blue/swing was accurate.
You say that you never said "fiddled", and then you post a quote that literally has the word "fiddled" in it.How many times do you need to see it????? Damn you ARE stupid!!
What you CLAIM I said. You literally said that I said THESE words verbatim.
"numbers are “fiddled” with to change the apparent political leanings of a state"
What I actually said. This is PROOF I did not say what you claim.
"THOSE numbers can't be fiddled with to get the result needed for an agenda."