Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Speakers
XXX Comps or Zapco C2K
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 3464996" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>Huh? First of all, how many octaves the speaker plays has nothing to do with this discussion, does it? Or, does a speaker that's only required to play 2 or 3 octaves allowed to sound bad? My point was I read around here all the time how 'good' MT's and BTL's sound, yet when having a discussion about XXX's its stated they are basically just an extreme output driver not geared towards SQ. Its ridiculous. Id have to ask, do any of you stating that xxx subs dont sound good, have direct experience with them? The only person Ive seen make any specific comments on their performance couldn't have been further off if he'd tried.</p><p>So you tell me, playing 2 octaves or not, why do <em>you</em> think a XXX sounds bad?</p><p></p><p>Further more, what comment on the XXX mids? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif I believe you are confused, I never made any such comment. Not that I ever made the comment in this thread, I think your notion of too much moving mass is silly. Did you miss Dan Wiggins article on inductance versus moving mass? Do you have any specific reason why you think xxx mids have substantially more moving mass than competing mids?</p><p></p><p>You appear to have misunderstood my stance here entirely.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 3464996, member: 549629"] Huh? First of all, how many octaves the speaker plays has nothing to do with this discussion, does it? Or, does a speaker that's only required to play 2 or 3 octaves allowed to sound bad? My point was I read around here all the time how 'good' MT's and BTL's sound, yet when having a discussion about XXX's its stated they are basically just an extreme output driver not geared towards SQ. Its ridiculous. Id have to ask, do any of you stating that xxx subs dont sound good, have direct experience with them? The only person Ive seen make any specific comments on their performance couldn't have been further off if he'd tried. So you tell me, playing 2 octaves or not, why do [I]you[/I] think a XXX sounds bad? Further more, what comment on the XXX mids? [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif[/IMG] I believe you are confused, I never made any such comment. Not that I ever made the comment in this thread, I think your notion of too much moving mass is silly. Did you miss Dan Wiggins article on inductance versus moving mass? Do you have any specific reason why you think xxx mids have substantially more moving mass than competing mids? You appear to have misunderstood my stance here entirely. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Speakers
XXX Comps or Zapco C2K
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh