slot port vs center port. loading concerns

If its two subs, then center port with a divider is superior to an L slot port because the subs will load evenly. The L port causes uneven pressure because one sub is near the mouth of the port than the other.

For multiple subs sharing the same chamber, i'd recommend this type of box.



If not then center port with a divider works fine



 
If its two subs, then center port with a divider is superior to an L slot port because the subs will load evenly. The L port causes uneven pressure because one sub is near the mouth of the port than the other.
For multiple subs sharing the same chamber, i'd recommend this type of box.



If not then center port with a divider works fine



as far as i know i can do a middle port which im not a fan of, but cant do a labrynth port because tuning to 33hz. 3.2 cubes total with 60 sq inches of port. My dimensions are 15H by 37.5W by 21.5D

this is what my guy has come up with. Just conerned with sub loading. The Total port lengh is 38



 
as far as i know i can do a middle port which im not a fan of, but cant do a labrynth port because tuning to 33hz. 3.2 cubes total with 60 sq inches of port. My dimensions are 15H by 37.5W by 21.5D
this is what my guy has come up with. Just conerned with sub loading. The Total port lengh is 38
Those numbers seem really sketchy. 1.6 cubes for a single 12 is pretty sub-optimal, not gonna lie. I'd go with more cubic feet than having an overload of port area. 19 port per cube is too much and seeing how its tuned to 32hz, its not an spl burp box so you shouldn't be using that much unless you want it peaky.

Thing about a center port box is, the box is stronger from the port bracing the middle so you gain back a few cubic feet of air space from not needing to overly brace as much.

this one is 3.8, center port with a much better loud daily port ratio.

cxtkS.jpg


 
Those numbers seem really sketchy. 1.6 cubes for a single 12 is pretty sub-optimal, not gonna lie. I'd go with more cubic feet than having an overload of port area. 19 port per cube is too much and seeing how its tuned to 32hz, its not an spl burp box so you shouldn't be using that much unless you want it peaky.
Thing about a center port box is, the box is stronger from the port bracing the middle so you gain back a few cubic feet of air space from not needing to overly brace as much.

this one is 3.8, center port with a much better loud daily port ratio.

cxtkS.jpg
he is running 2 dss ethos 12s and limited on space...the internal net space is correct for his power, they are similar to DC in the aspect of small boxes...and as far as his port area, it is high and expected peaky but they have been proven to like higher port area...i did my 148db drop in from 2 dc xl 10" m1 in my mustang trunk on 4k with about 20sq per cube...and it was musical..he will be fine...im the dealer, designer and builder btw lol

 
You could very well have loading issues with the sub to the left being so close to the port mouth. No way for the wave to develop before it leaves the port. I'd seriously consider a center port design, but that's just how I design my enclosures. Perfect for middle box bracing as well. I ran my hdc310 with 20" per and it was quite musical to my surprise though.

 
You could very well have loading issues with the sub to the left being so close to the port mouth. No way for the wave to develop before it leaves the port. I'd seriously consider a center port design, but that's just how I design my enclosures. Perfect for middle box bracing as well. I ran my hdc310 with 20" per and it was quite musical to my surprise though.

thank you. we decided on 3.2 cubes 60 sq inches of port and kerf center port.

 
I've only seen unloading issues with subs getting 3-5X times RMS, for most daily setups it isn't usually an issue. I do prefer center port personally as you get "free" bracing....

 
It's only loading issue its a phasing issue.its small but everytging counts. I personally like to do decided chambers with subs up port back at the bottom of the box with a devider in the ports. With the ports being directly benith the woofers. It's preference though but I do try to avoid loading and keep phasing in mind..

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

Whoa, that will be one skinny port. The width of the back wall ports will be 1.08" wide (27.5mm), but the front port will be shared by 2 subs so...
5
704
Yeah, saw that too, was like ??? wtf! They do know there stuff, I usually just roll with it!
13
867
You could try to make the port longer, but there might be other reasons with the box won't extend lower, or even the sub. You'd have to reverse...
3
566
While that program is pretty neat, it assumes you know the values. I was just recapping the numbers you provided. RS recommends the following...
4
725
Yup. That is the bread truck that Richard Clark built for MTX many years ago . 60 inch subwoofer. The problem was that the truck wasn’t...
14
2K

About this thread

cocoleveo7686

10+ year member
CarAudio.com Elite
Thread starter
cocoleveo7686
Joined
Location
MA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
11
Views
13,145
Last reply date
Last reply from
Papermaker85
IMG_0635.jpg

just call me KeV

    Apr 19, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
AAWT7583.JPG

just call me KeV

    Apr 19, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

Latest topics

Top