I'm thinking real hard about trying them. Those RU bramas are they even close to the real thing? i know its a different coil but the rest is the same. i dont think they have the excursion eitherRU comes up with some cool products, like the old Brahma's, but their business practices are sometimes called into question. Ive heard of issues with providing warranty work, problems with quality control, and general complaints about customer service. But Ive also heard good stories.
Id give it about a 50/50 chance of having a good expereince with them at this point. But that is a total guess based on other people's reviews.
ever heard a set of the hard times?i like their ****. its like an abomination woofers. preety cool tho. just not spl stuff
nope i never mess with RBU stuff before. looks cool tho . id try it if i could thoever heard a set of the hard times?
RU comes up with some cool products, like the old Brahma's
This is a quote from Steven Kephart on another forum (he's a former Adire employee, so he's familiar with the Brahma);I'm thinking real hard about trying them. Those RU bramas are they even close to the real thing? i know its a different coil but the rest is the same. i dont think they have the excursion either
good post, I love old adire.. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif.. miss em.This is a quote from Steven Kephart on another forum (he's a former Adire employee, so he's familiar with the Brahma);
"Just so you know, the Robot Underground subs are far from the original Brahma performance. They use a much longer coil which completely eliminates the XBL^2 motor topology, creating more of an evenhung motor. This means that BL will be very peaky (Madonna's proven peaky isn't good ), distortion will be higher, and linear excursion will be much lower. "
I wouldn't buy one.
Good point, I did not know that about the RU subs. Another good option is the CSS SDX15, which uses the Brahma motor (and retains xbl^2) for considerably less $ than the Brahma ever sold for. Now that I think about it, I dont know why I didn't just mention the SDX15 in my first post, since RU is shady anyway.This is a quote from Steven Kephart on another forum (he's a former Adire employee, so he's familiar with the Brahma);
"Just so you know, the Robot Underground subs are far from the original Brahma performance. They use a much longer coil which completely eliminates the XBL^2 motor topology, creating more of an evenhung motor. This means that BL will be very peaky (Madonna's proven peaky isn't good ), distortion will be higher, and linear excursion will be much lower. "
I would never buy one.
If you were interested particularly in a Brahma, I'd check out Exodus' "-X" subwoofer line-up. They use an updated version of the Brahma motor and are considerably more cost effective than the hack-job Brahma's sold by RU.
markIV motor?Good point, I did not know that about the RU subs. Another good option is the CSS SDX15, which uses the Brahma motor (and retains xbl^2) for considerably less $ than the Brahma ever sold for. Now that I think about it, I dont know why I didn't just mention the SDX15 in my first post, since RU is shady anyway.
OUCH !"Just so you know, the Robot Underground subs are far from the original Brahma performance. They use a much longer coil which completely eliminates the XBL^2 motor topology, creating more of an evenhung motor. This means that BL will be very peaky, distortion will be higher, and linear excursion will be much lower. "
pat from robot underground sent 4 15" "brahmas" to my house for a install. the subs were ****ed up and sounded like ****. also got some "hcca" mids and highs and were way over priced and had no label, just plain. the owners manual wass for hcca componets. he sent some gay "bassboomers for mids" and a couple shirts for free...... i wouldnt sport it.I'm thinking real hard about trying them. Those RU bramas are they even close to the real thing? i know its a different coil but the rest is the same. i dont think they have the excursion either