Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ThxOne" data-source="post: 8828421" data-attributes="member: 675210">No need for exact numbers for fraudulent votes.Ah yes, the unproved and unprovable conspiracy fantasy of the &quot;stolen vote&quot;. Do you believe in Bigfoot and the lizard people too?Do you?You are being far to literal but ok, let's do this. Leave Trump and Biden alone until they plan to prosecute them. Better?Too literal? You always complain you are being interpreted. Can't have both. Pick one. Literal or interpreted?What are we charging Hunter with?Always means constantly. I do not complain that I am being interpreted constantly. What YOU are doing is exaggerating. It is not needed so please stop.Hunter doesn't need to touch, view or discuss classified documents.Following that link and actually reading the only time the word &quot;classified&quot; comes up is to say that after the presidents term access shall be restricted.You should read parts 2202 and 2203. They cover the rules of documents when a POTUS leaves office.&nbsp; And it's law. They do not specifically state &quot;Classified Documents&quot;. Since you want to be literal, that is literal. That being said, Biden has classified documents from when he was vice president. If anyone is violating the law it would be him. Or do you think that is incorrect?&quot;If anyone is violating the law it would be him.&quot; That wording is deliberate to imply that that Trump didn't violate law with his actions, which we already know he did. It's seeming that Biden may have, too. If so, Trump removed them as President. Biden was a Vice President. Do you not know the difference?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ThxOne, post: 8828421, member: 675210"] No need for exact numbers for fraudulent votes. [B]Ah yes, the unproved and unprovable conspiracy fantasy of the "stolen vote". Do you believe in Bigfoot and the lizard people too? Do you?[/B] You are being far to literal but ok, let's do this. Leave Trump and Biden alone until they plan to prosecute them. Better? [B]Too literal? You always complain you are being interpreted. Can't have both. Pick one. Literal or interpreted? What are we charging Hunter with? Always means constantly. I do not complain that I am being interpreted constantly. What YOU are doing is exaggerating. It is not needed so please stop. Hunter doesn't need to touch, view or discuss classified documents.[/B] Following that link and actually reading the only time the word "classified" comes up is to say that after the presidents term access shall be restricted. [B]You should read parts 2202 and 2203. They cover the rules of documents when a POTUS leaves office. And it's law. They do not specifically state "Classified Documents". Since you want to be literal, that is literal. [/B] That being said, Biden has classified documents from when he was vice president. If anyone is violating the law it would be him. Or do you think that is incorrect? "[I]If anyone is violating the law it would be him.[/I]" [B]That wording is deliberate to imply that that Trump didn't violate law with his actions, which we already know he did. It's seeming that Biden may have, too. If so, Trump removed them as President. Biden was a Vice President. Do you not know the difference?[/B] [/QUOTE]

Verification