Winners only.

ThxOne

Aftermarket Specialist
5,000+ posts
12,061
2,482
Kentucky
Repeating things you say and thoughts you express is not "speaking for you".
YOU stated pot is not a drug. YOU stated the vax doesn't work. I simply repeated those things.
If "hearing" your own stuff repeated back to you makes things difficult, then you may want to reconsider posting them?



Still stuck on the homophobia. So, unable to handle a truce on the insults?
Eat a diick Rob, eat.... a..... diick.

I 100% did say those words... however, you have left off the rest of the statements included with those words. The other words that give it context. Part of the liberal playbook? Your statement would be correct if you actually did the things you just claimed. "Repeating things you say" If you are going to do this then repeat EVERYTHING that was said. When you TELL ME WHAT I MEANT then YOU ARE SPEAKING FOR ME. It is very concerning that you don't know the difference.
 

Buck

Why so Sirius?
5,000+ posts
10+ year member
30,677
1,779
Inside of a pyramid
‘The Navy has been working on robotic warships for years, as in 2020 the military branch announced it is designing a system for its unmanned robotic warships that will communicate like human sailors, allowing the craft to safely navigate through waterways.’


B61AE88A-702D-4E01-BB7E-3F27FF5349DC.gif
 

RobGMN

CarAudio.com VIP
5,000+ posts
8,027
731
MN
Eat a diick Rob, eat.... a..... diick.

I 100% did say those words... however, you have left off the rest of the statements included with those words. The other words that give it context. Part of the liberal playbook? Your statement would be correct if you actually did the things you just claimed. "Repeating things you say" If you are going to do this then repeat EVERYTHING that was said. When you TELL ME WHAT I MEANT then YOU ARE SPEAKING FOR ME. It is very concerning that you don't know the difference.
You seemingly don't understand the concept of "context". If you say pot is not a drug, there should be no "context" that changes that. If there is, then you should not be making the statement in the first place.

It's a definitive statement that should be able to stand on its own. If you want "context" to alter the meaning, then you really shouldn't make the statement in the first place.
If you say "pot is not a drug", then that is where you stand. That is what you MEAN.
If you said "Pot is not a drug except when used for illicit purposes." and I only quoted "Pot is not a drug", then i would be taking your words out of CONTEXT and creating a new meaning from them. I did not such thing and I do no such thing when I repeat your words or the claims you make.

I haven't, and I won't.
 

RobGMN

CarAudio.com VIP
5,000+ posts
8,027
731
MN
‘The Navy has been working on robotic warships for years, as in 2020 the military branch announced it is designing a system for its unmanned robotic warships that will communicate like human sailors, allowing the craft to safely navigate through waterways.’


View attachment 41063
Nice followup to your "post something worth reading" demand.
I'm sure there are lost of folks folks here who never saw Terminator or any of your dozens of past posts with the same dumb picture. You really nailed it with this one!
 

ThxOne

Aftermarket Specialist
5,000+ posts
12,061
2,482
Kentucky
You seemingly don't understand the concept of "context". If you say pot is not a drug, there should be no "context" that changes that. If there is, then you should not be making the statement in the first place.

It's a definitive statement that should be able to stand on its own. If you want "context" to alter the meaning, then you really shouldn't make the statement in the first place.
If you say "pot is not a drug", then that is where you stand. That is what you MEAN.
If you said "Pot is not a drug except when used for illicit purposes." and I only quoted "Pot is not a drug", then i would be taking your words out of CONTEXT and creating a new meaning from them. I did not such thing and I do no such thing when I repeat your words or the claims you make.

I haven't, and I won't.
Again you don't know how to quote or pay attention. Stop trying to correct me if you are going to do it incorrectly.

How about YOU stop being so painfully ANAL before YOU get Monkeypox. Here, follow this link... perhaps there is a forum there that would better fit you.

 

RobGMN

CarAudio.com VIP
5,000+ posts
8,027
731
MN
Again you don't know how to quote or pay attention. Stop trying to correct me if you are going to do it incorrectly.

How about YOU stop being so painfully ANAL before YOU get Monkeypox. Here, follow this link... perhaps there is a forum there that would better fit you.

You get so triggered when it is pointed out that you don't understand concepts like "context" and "quote" and "comprehend", and then you simply lash out like a child.
Above is a quote of your entire post, and here is a quote of a sentence within that post: "Again you don't know how to quote or pay attention."

Just like the word "bill", there can be several meanings and methods.

Just a suggestion, but maybe you should expand your knowledge so: 1) You can be better at arguing your theories 2) Post less incorrect stuff that you can be called out on. 3) be less angry that you are not cognizant of the concepts being discussed.

it wouldn't cost you anything to TRY.
 

ThxOne

Aftermarket Specialist
5,000+ posts
12,061
2,482
Kentucky
You get so triggered when it is pointed out that you don't understand concepts like "context" and "quote" and "comprehend", and then you simply lash out like a child.

Just a suggestion, but maybe you should expand your knowledge so: 1) You can be better at arguing your theories 2) Post less incorrect stuff that you can be called out on.

it wouldn't cost you anything to TRY.
No, I am good to go. You will not flip your ignorance on me.

I will make this statement. You fail 99.4% of the time when you attempt to quote me or correct me.
 

ThxOne

Aftermarket Specialist
5,000+ posts
12,061
2,482
Kentucky
LOL China is sanctioning Pelosi and her family. That is awesome!!
 

RobGMN

CarAudio.com VIP
5,000+ posts
8,027
731
MN
No, I am good to go. You will not flip your ignorance on me.

I will make this statement. You fail 99.4% of the time when you attempt to quote me or correct me.
Well, at least you were correct when you called it a “statement”, but the statement itself is wildly inaccurate.

You can’t say a quote is wrong when the quote is an exact duplication of your words, enclosed in quotation marks. That’s precisely how quotes work. 🤦🏼‍♂️

Quote - repeat or copy out (a group of words from a text or speech), typically with an indication that one is not the original author or speaker.
 

ThxOne

Aftermarket Specialist
5,000+ posts
12,061
2,482
Kentucky
Well, at least you were correct when you called it a “statement”, but the statement itself is wildly inaccurate.

You can’t say a quote is wrong when the quote is an exact duplication of your words, enclosed in quotation marks. That’s precisely how quotes work. 🤦🏼‍♂️

Not what you do. You leave out words purposely which makes the intended meaning look different, typically so it supports YOUR argument.

Quote - repeat or copy out (a group of words from a text or speech), typically with an indication that one is not the original author or speaker.

Stop trying to teach me. I already know what the meaning of the word Quote is. Eat a diick.
 

RobGMN

CarAudio.com VIP
5,000+ posts
8,027
731
MN
Well, at least you were correct when you called it a “statement”, but the statement itself is wildly inaccurate.

You can’t say a quote is wrong when the quote is an exact duplication of your words, enclosed in quotation marks. That’s precisely how quotes work. 🤦🏼‍♂️

Not what you do. You leave out words purposely which makes the intended meaning look different, typically so it supports YOUR argument.

Quote - repeat or copy out (a group of words from a text or speech), typically with an indication that one is not the original author or speaker.

Stop trying to teach me. I already know what the meaning of the word Quote is. Eat a diick.
Nope. I have never made an edited quote of your words. I quote them exactly as they are posted by you.
You can look at every single time I have quoted you, and you will see that. I may be a lot of things, but a liar isn't one of them.

I would gladly link every single time I have posted a quote of something you have put on this thread. There is not a single instance where you could say I modified the words I have quoted. NOT ONE.

This is yet another instance where you make a claim that you can't back with evidence because the claim is patently false. Don't do that. It reflects poorly on you as a person.
 

RobGMN

CarAudio.com VIP
5,000+ posts
8,027
731
MN
  • Like
Reactions: Jimi77

ThxOne

Aftermarket Specialist
5,000+ posts
12,061
2,482
Kentucky
Nope. I have never made an edited quote of your words. I quote them exactly as they are posted by you.
You can look at every single time I have quoted you, and you will see that. I may be a lot of things, but a liar isn't one of them.

I would gladly link every single time I have posted a quote of something you have put on this thread. There is not a single instance where you could say I modified the words I have quoted. NOT ONE.

This is yet another instance where you make a claim that you can't back with evidence because the claim is patently false. Don't do that. It reflects poorly on you as a person.
Actually you have done it or I wouldn't bring it up so many times. I have looked at every single time you have attempted to quote me. I will encourage you to just stop now.

Unless you go back and edit every time you have attempted to quote me they will not match up. As I have said, there is but a hand full of times where you actually quoted me word for word.

Why don't you just leave it alone now.
 

About this thread

Participants
Who Replied
Replies
24,408
Views
594,067
Last reply date
Last reply from
Jimi77

Latest threads