Winners only.
- Thread starter Slo_Ride
- Start date
- Replies 24K
- Views 592K
Let’s try again.
You think the Trump classified documents theft was resolved by Biden getting 81M votes.
Why would you think Biden getting g 81M votes resolves the issue of Trump taking classified documents on his departure from the White House after he was soundly trounced in the election?
Let’s try again.
You think the Trump classified documents theft was resolved by Biden getting 81M votes. <---- Statement.
Why would you think Biden getting g 81M votes resolves the issue of Trump taking classified documents on his departure from the White House after he was soundly trounced in the election? <---- Clearly you can't follow along.
Let me see if I can clear it up for you.
Orange man do bad things. Him need go away. We make all better wiff Biden.
Well, Biden was inserted into the Oval Office so all should have been good in the world and all you whiny Dems should have no need to keep speaking Trumps name. However, you still do. Y'all made a big deal about Trump and classified documents but talk soft about Biden's less secure possession of classified documents that we are also finding out his son was in possession of and sharing classified information with other countries.
If Trump broke the law with the classified documents, lock him up. This should be a clear statement.
Lock Biden and his addict son up too.
You think the Trump classified documents theft was resolved by Biden getting 81M votes. <---- Statement.
Why would you think Biden getting g 81M votes resolves the issue of Trump taking classified documents on his departure from the White House after he was soundly trounced in the election? <---- Clearly you can't follow along.
Let me see if I can clear it up for you.
Orange man do bad things. Him need go away. We make all better wiff Biden.
Well, Biden was inserted into the Oval Office so all should have been good in the world and all you whiny Dems should have no need to keep speaking Trumps name. However, you still do. Y'all made a big deal about Trump and classified documents but talk soft about Biden's less secure possession of classified documents that we are also finding out his son was in possession of and sharing classified information with other countries.
If Trump broke the law with the classified documents, lock him up. This should be a clear statement.
Lock Biden and his addict son up too.
Does he think he’s still president? This guy is fvcking delusional.
And idiots will still vote for him.
So, YOU are under the impression that Biden being voted into office gave Trump free reign to do whatever he wanted, and that any legal infractions he committed would be ignored.
That’s a pretty weird assumption. Did you think Biden would pardon Trump like Trump wanted to pardon the insurrectionists?
If not, then why?
We already know Trump broke the law. Are you for licking him up immediately, or do you still think the docs he had were only allegedly classified?
So, YOU are under the impression that Biden being voted into office gave Trump free reign to do whatever he wanted, and that any legal infractions he committed would be ignored. <---- Another statement. Do you plan to continue to tell me what I think?
That’s a pretty weird assumption. Did you think Biden would pardon Trump like Trump wanted to pardon the insurrectionists? When Biden was inserted into office there was no knowledge of Trump with classified documents so there would be no need for a pardon right?
If not, then why? See above response.
We already know Trump broke the law. Are you for licking him up immediately, or do you still think the docs he had were only allegedly classified? You are assuming he broke the law. He hasn't been convicted so technically he is suspected of breaking the law.
Also... I am not even trying to think about licking him up immediately. I am heterosexual. Yikes!
That’s a pretty weird assumption. Did you think Biden would pardon Trump like Trump wanted to pardon the insurrectionists? When Biden was inserted into office there was no knowledge of Trump with classified documents so there would be no need for a pardon right?
If not, then why? See above response.
We already know Trump broke the law. Are you for licking him up immediately, or do you still think the docs he had were only allegedly classified? You are assuming he broke the law. He hasn't been convicted so technically he is suspected of breaking the law.
Also... I am not even trying to think about licking him up immediately. I am heterosexual. Yikes!
<---- Another statement. Do you plan to continue to tell me what I think?
You don’t like your words being used as a tool to understand what you are thinking, yet you assume the right to determine what 81M voters were thinking when they voted for Biden.
One helluva sense of entitlement there, kid.
When Biden was inserted into office there was no knowledge of Trump with classified documents so there would be no need for a pardon right?
Pardons can be issued well after the fact. Like when some already in jail is…PARDONED.
Are you new?
If not, then why? See above response.
You are assuming he broke the law. He hasn't been convicted so technically he is suspected of breaking the law.
His refusal to comply when told the documents must be returned was a violation of law. Conviction is not a requirement for a law to be broken. If you think it is, you are sadly mistaken.
Also... I am not even trying to think about licking him up immediately. I am heterosexual. Yikes!
Nice catch on the typo, and excellent job running with it. LOcking him up is what I meant.
Are you in favor of locking him up immediately for breaking the law by not returning the documents when they were demanded?
You don’t like your words being used as a tool to understand what you are thinking, yet you assume the right to determine what 81M voters were thinking when they voted for Biden.
One helluva sense of entitlement there, kid.
When Biden was inserted into office there was no knowledge of Trump with classified documents so there would be no need for a pardon right?
Pardons can be issued well after the fact. Like when some already in jail is…PARDONED.
Are you new?
If not, then why? See above response.
You are assuming he broke the law. He hasn't been convicted so technically he is suspected of breaking the law.
His refusal to comply when told the documents must be returned was a violation of law. Conviction is not a requirement for a law to be broken. If you think it is, you are sadly mistaken.
Also... I am not even trying to think about licking him up immediately. I am heterosexual. Yikes!
Nice catch on the typo, and excellent job running with it. LOcking him up is what I meant.
Are you in favor of locking him up immediately for breaking the law by not returning the documents when they were demanded?
Last edited:
Eggs
Junior Member
they got what what was needed and green light from xi
Kauai homes the Pacific defense missile system
Last edited:
Eggs
Junior Member
Eggs
Junior Member
How bout forgive credit card debt? Wonder what the Rothschilds goin say? The global banking system is to powerful.
Eggs
Junior Member
81M was me being sarcastic.
No need for a pardon without a conviction. Nope, I am old enough.
Show me the law that non compliance to return the documents is a violation of the law. Conviction is needed for punishment though.
I am not for anyone being locked up until adjudicated guilty in a court of law... not the court of opinions.
81M was me being sarcastic.
I see that. You were short by over 1/4 million.
No need for a pardon without a conviction. Nope, I am old enough.
You said no law is broken without a conviction. Different concepts.
Show me the law that non compliance to return the documents is a violation of the law. Conviction is needed for punishment though.
44 U.S.C. ß2201-2209,
I am not for anyone being locked up until adjudicated guilty in a court of law... not the court of opinions.
OK. You left out that detail in your statement. “If Trump broke the law with the classified documents, lock him up. This should be a clear statement.
Lock Biden and his addict son up too.”
What are we locking up Biden and his son for?
I see that. You were short by over 1/4 million.
No need for a pardon without a conviction. Nope, I am old enough.
You said no law is broken without a conviction. Different concepts.
Show me the law that non compliance to return the documents is a violation of the law. Conviction is needed for punishment though.
44 U.S.C. ß2201-2209,
I am not for anyone being locked up until adjudicated guilty in a court of law... not the court of opinions.
OK. You left out that detail in your statement. “If Trump broke the law with the classified documents, lock him up. This should be a clear statement.
Lock Biden and his addict son up too.”
What are we locking up Biden and his son for?
Last edited:
No need for exact numbers for fraudulent votes.
You are being far to literal but ok, let's do this. Leave Trump and Biden alone until they plan to prosecute them. Better?
Following that link and actually reading the only time the word "classified" comes up is to say that after the presidents term access shall be restricted.
"§ 2204. Restrictions on access to Presidential records
(a) Prior to the conclusion of a President’s term of office or last consecutive term of office, as the case may be, the President shall specify durations, not to exceed 12 years, for which access shall be restricted with respect to information, in a Presidential record, within one or more of the following categories:
(1)(A) specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and
(B) in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order;"
That being said, Biden has classified documents from when he was vice president. If anyone is violating the law it would be him. Or do you think that is incorrect?
About this thread
