Winners only.

[Jimi77]

As is your understanding of finding things other people have figured out and the knowledge they have shared and allowed you to access to make yourself appear smart.

🙄 🖕

That's how the entire world operates unless you're a lawyer who gets a case in front of a supreme court, you're not "discovering" any new laws. Unless you're Einstein or other elite level scientist, you're not discovering anything new. Even most PHd's are just applying knowledge from the guys higher up the chain.

So ultimately the question is, are "you" smart enough to take in the information gathered by smarter people, make sense of it and apply it to your life. Or if that's beyond you, can you at least construct a "full proof" conspiracy theory. Ie, the original QAnon conspiracy theory about Dems and their powerful allies operating a child sex trafficking ring or the Cooper/Icke Lizard people conspiracy. Most of the current right wing conspiracies are too easy to pokes through.

 

[ThxOne]

That's how the entire world operates unless you're a lawyer who gets a case in front of a supreme court, you're not "discovering" any new laws. Unless you're Einstein or other elite level scientist, you're not discovering anything new. Even most PHd's are just applying knowledge from the guys higher up the chain.

So ultimately the question is, are "you" smart enough to take in the information gathered by smarter people, make sense of it and apply it to your life. Or if that's beyond you, can you at least construct a "full proof" conspiracy theory. Ie, the original QAnon conspiracy theory about Dems and their powerful allies operating a child sex trafficking ring or the Cooper/Icke Lizard people conspiracy. Most of the current right wing conspiracies are too easy to pokes through.

Yeah that's not what Rob does. He plays it off like he already knows everything because he has Google right there. I promise you, he is dumb as shit if the power goes out.

 

[ThxOne]

I don't even know what these are.

QAnon conspiracy theory about Dems and their powerful allies operating a child sex trafficking ring or the Cooper/Icke Lizard people conspiracy

 

[RobGMN]

This is what happens when I dumb shit down for you *******. Don't worry, I know now you do this shit on purpose so you can later claim you were right. The ONLY reason you are literal is so you can argue. You will ignore common sense and comprehension so you can go back and use a literal term or word to "win the argument". Literal doesn't always apply you clown. When I say I need to "see" the rape it does not mean that if I am not in the room watching the rape happen, it never happened. It means I need to see the visual evidence such as a video not edited by the alleged victim. That is literally what I mean but your cocksucking ass will focus on ONE WORD to be literal about. Because you suck dicks. Being an ******* to be an ******* Rob is no way to live and can get you fucked up. You may want to be careful with that shit out in public.

That's a lot of typing to say that you change your standards to fit your narrative.
Hypocrite.

 

[RobGMN]

Yeah that's not what Rob does. He plays it off like he already knows everything because he has Google right there. I promise you, he is dumb as shit if the power goes out.

Says the guy who can't even understand basic math, spelling, grammar, law, science, anatomy, etc.

 

[Jimi77]

Yeah that's not what Rob does. He plays it off like he already knows everything because he has Google right there. I promise you, he is dumb as shit if the power goes out.

I've never got the impression Rob thinks he knows everything. I do get the impression that Rob takes the time to research and make informed decisions. Probably goes with the mentality/personality that fraud inspector would need to last in the industry - gather facts, what do the facts tell say, draw a conclusion.

Many people tend to operate backwards; they draw a conclusion then try to back fill in the facts to fit the conclusion. It's pretty easy to spot because their narrative lacks cohesion. Perfect example is the anti-vaxxer's attempts to make the vaccine appear to be dangerous. BLM is another great example and has lead to the insane conclusion that the solution to the problem is to stop enforcing laws in an attempt to avoid the simple fact that laws cannot really be racist. Every time they come up with a new angle, it's full of holes and collapses under examination. This is why so many folks have turned to the conspiracy theory - they're trying to prop a position that isn't supported by facts and examination, therefore they are "forced" to plug in the holes in their narrative with a backroom conspiracy to explain away the holes in their story.

 

[ThxOne]

That's a lot of typing to say that you change your standards to fit your narrative.
Hypocrite.

Whatever liar.

 

[ThxOne]

Says the guy who can't even understand basic math, spelling, grammar, law, science, anatomy, etc.

Yup, classic Rob, fall back on shit YOU made up.

 

[ThxOne]

I've never got the impression Rob thinks he knows everything. I do get the impression that Rob takes the time to research and make informed decisions. Probably goes with the mentality/personality that fraud inspector would need to last in the industry - gather facts, what do the facts tell say, draw a conclusion.

Many people tend to operate backwards; they draw a conclusion then try to back fill in the facts to fit the conclusion. It's pretty easy to spot because their narrative lacks cohesion. Perfect example is the anti-vaxxer's attempts to make the vaccine appear to be dangerous. BLM is another great example and has lead to the insane conclusion that the solution to the problem is to stop enforcing laws in an attempt to avoid the simple fact that laws cannot really be racist. Every time they come up with a new angle, it's full of holes and collapses under examination. This is why so many folks have turned to the conspiracy theory - they're trying to prop a position that isn't supported by facts and examination, therefore they are "forced" to plug in the holes in their narrative with a backroom conspiracy to explain away the holes in their story.

Sure and that mentality has robbed him of basic communication and comprehension skills. Not everything needs to be proven and argued with facts. Sometimes it just a conversation. Sometimes it just people voicing their opinions. Nope, not with Rob. As he has stated, his goal is to argue.

 

[Jimi77]

Definitely the gov't overstepping it bounds. She doesn't work in a gov't office. LGBTQxyz crowd are more than welcome to get their wedding websites done elsewhere.

'Deeply held beliefs': Colorado designer before Supreme Court says she cannot condone LGBT weddings

www.msn.com

 

[Jimi77]

Sure and that mentality has robbed him of basic communication and comprehension skills. Not everything needs to be proven and argued with facts. Sometimes it just a conversation. Sometimes it just people voicing their opinions. Nope, not with Rob. As he has stated, his goal is to argue.

It is a politics thread...

 

[ThxOne]

It is a politics thread...

Irrelevant.

 

[RobGMN]

Yup, classic Rob, fall back on shit YOU made up.

Do we need examples again?? Why not?

Math: Averages. Real v. nominal pricing. Percentages. You understand none of these concepts.
Spelling: You've used to, too, their, their, and other words incorrectly.
Grammar: You think "an" is used prior to a word that begins with a consonant "y".
Law: You think CFR is just made-up bullshit. You think a conviction cannot happen without evidence.
Science: You think vaccines prevent illness.
Anatomy: You think bones have no nerves in them.

 

[ThxOne]

Do we need examples again?? Why not?

Math: Averages. Real v. nominal pricing. Percentages. You understand none of these concepts.
Spelling: You've used to, too, their, their, and other words incorrectly.
Grammar: You think "an" is used prior to a word that begins with a consonant "y".
Law: You think CFR is just made-up bullshit. You think a conviction cannot happen without evidence.
Science: You think vaccines prevent illness.
Anatomy: You think bones have no nerves in them.

1) Your opinion
2) So have you
3) I proved that it can in a specific use
4) Your opinion of statements I didn't make
5) That's right, they go through them

Man you rally do love to make shit up and act like it's what I believe. Since you want to continue to speak for me and tell me what I believe you can go eat some more dicks. Chomp Chomp Chomp lil fella.

 

[RobGMN]

1) Your opinion
2) So have you
3) I proved that it can in a specific use
4) Your opinion of statements I didn't make
5) That's right, they go through them

Man you rally do love to make shit up and act like it's what I believe. Since you want to continue to speak for me and tell me what I believe you can go eat some more dicks. Chomp Chomp Chomp lil fella.

Tell me which of those things are made up; I'll quote a post of yours that proves they are all very real.

Hell, people are still laughing at your "nefarious averages" and "how do you vaccinate PART of a person?" nonsense.
Your high opinion of your intellect is very misplaced, kid.