Winners only.

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

What could go wrong?

Scientists Increasingly Calling to Dim the Sun

The idea of "solar geoengineering," or shooting particles into the stratosphere to reduce the warming of the Sun, is no longer science fiction.

futurism.com

Kinda like all the crap we already dump into the atmosphere - what could go wrong?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I see you are going to change the topic now so you can argue. You could just accept that you are a hypocrite and leave it at that. Too bad my point has been made and proven so..., you can argue with yourself, Son.

“Change the topic”? No, we’re still discussing your constant flip-flopping on the standards you apply to decisions.
Constantly changing so you can maintain your false narratives in support of your orange hero.
Hypocrite.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

@Jimi77

A pleasant request: will you give a cue when you are being sarcastic? It's tough to gauge in this format.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

“Change the topic”? No, we’re still discussing your constant flip-flopping on the standards you apply to decisions.
Constantly changing so you can maintain your false narratives in support of your orange hero.
Hypocrite.

No you changed the topic and just did it again in this post to "Constant flip-flopping".

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Thanks, Joe.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

And the world isn't perfect.

That's why they have Title IX to make things fair.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

No you changed the topic and just did it again in this post to "Constant flip-flopping".

You’re trying to change the topic by accusing me of changing the topic.

So I’ll again try to steer you back to it: How is it you wholly believe-without any proof or evidence-in mass voter fraud effecting the election of Biden, but you can’t believe a woman got ***** unless you saw it happen to her?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

That's why they have Title IX to make things fair.

It's not fair if girls have to compete against a "former" male who has been jacked up on testosterone for years. If the NCAA caught a female athlete who did, say a decade long steroid program, I'm pretty sure she'd get the boot. But if she was he then it's all good? How's that fair?

 

[SlugButter]

It's not fair if girls have to compete against a "former" male who has been jacked up on testosterone for years. If the NCAA caught a female athlete who did, say a decade long steroid program, I'm pretty sure she'd get the boot. But if she was he then it's all good? How's that fair?

And, the girls who transition to male are not competing with biological males and breaking mens records. Not a single instance of that happening. Their ”science“ falls apart when it doesn’t go both ways. It’s obviously not fair, but they think they are somehow being virtuous to let men beat the sh1t out of girls. letting men break womens records could almost be construed as sexism.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

It's not fair if girls have to compete against a "former" male who has been jacked up on testosterone for years. If the NCAA caught a female athlete who did, say a decade long steroid program, I'm pretty sure she'd get the boot. But if she was he then it's all good? How's that fair?

Exactly how much are you seeing this happen? Are we all hung up on the one swimmer who got away with it? Please show me where this is a rampant problem in College or Professional sports?