Winners only.

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

The argument is pretty much testosterone. Due to testosterone (and maybe some other factors) men are bigger, stronger, faster, etc. Should women play in men's sports - probably not. Do women have an unfair advantage playing against men - except for rare few sports, no they do not.

What if the sport isn't offered to men only women? I've seen it happen. Should they be allowed to play then? Testosterone isn't the only question

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

What if the sport isn't offered to men only women? I've seen it happen. Should they be allowed to play then? Testosterone isn't the only question

I understand there are multiple issues, but I certainly don't think it's fair for women to compete against "former" men. Additionally, maybe rather than the world bending over to accommodate their peculiarity, perhaps these folks should pick a different sport, do what Jenner did and wait until after their athletic career is over, etc.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

View attachment 44940

And the shooters own friends aren't buying it. You conveniently left that part out. His own friend said that he would make ********** statements. Nice try.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

What the fudge do these paintings or their artists have to do with global warming, climate change, big oil, etc? Why can't people just stop being a-holes?

MSN

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

I understand there are multiple issues, but I certainly don't think it's fair for women to compete against "former" men. Additionally, maybe rather than the world bending over to accommodate their peculiarity, perhaps these folks should pick a different sport, do what Jenner did and wait until after their athletic career is over, etc.

I'm talking about a straight man competing in a sport with women because said sport isn't offered to men. Should he be allowed to play?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

And the shooters own friends aren't buying it. You conveniently left that part out. His own friend said that he would make ********** statements. Nice try.

I read that he was fond of using ghey slurs. That said doesn't mean he wasn't ghey or some variation of non-binary.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I'm talking about a straight man competing in a sport with women because said sport isn't offered to men. Should he be allowed to play?

Probably not. There might be exceptions, but if his gender gives him a competitive advantage, I'd say no. We ban steroids' in sports to level the playing field...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

OK, tell us. What meanings can you find in this sentence other than "crime is impossible without evidence"?
Your words: "believing the impossible (crime) without evidence."

You said this - "You seem to be ok believing the impossible (mass voter fraud) without evidence"

I said this - "you seem to be ok with believing the impossible (crime) without evidence"

Mocking you in the same way you phrased your sentence. You put a thing in parenthesis "the mass voter fraud" claiming I believe it without evidence and I mocked you and put a thing in parenthesis "the crime" which you believe happened without evidence. You remember right? The **** that you have no problem convicting someone of with no evidence. I was pointing out your hypocrisy. I know, it's hard for you to comprehend and that's why you demand people explain things to you. Oh how boring books must be to you when you can't comprehend.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

I read that he was fond of using ghey slurs. That said doesn't mean he wasn't ghey or some variation of non-binary.

Why are you spelling gay like that? Ghey

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Probably not. There might be exceptions, but if his gender gives him a competitive advantage, I'd say no. We ban steroids' in sports to level the playing field...

But the sport isn't offered to boys/men so that would be discrimination.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You said this - "You seem to be ok believing the impossible (mass voter fraud) without evidence"

I said this - "you seem to be ok with believing the impossible (crime) without evidence"

Mocking you in the same way you phrased your sentence. You put a thing in parenthesis "the mass voter fraud" claiming I believe it without evidence and I mocked you and put a thing in parenthesis "the crime" which you believe happened without evidence. You remember right? The **** that you have no problem convicting someone of with no evidence. I was pointing out your hypocrisy. I know, it's hard for you to comprehend and that's why you demand people explain things to you. Oh how boring books must be to you when you can't comprehend.

Apples and oranges.
Where you fail, yet again, is that no one has been able to produce a SHRED of evidence of mass voter fraud that effected the election of Biden.
Unlike that giant pile of horse manure perpetrated and perpetuated by your lord and savior Trump, people produce evidence and highly credible testimony of **** all the time. It's how convictions occur.

So go ahead, produce hard evidence and highly credible testimony of the mass voter fraud.
I've only asked a dozen times or more for it.
And no, "a lot of Republicans feel" is not evidence, proof, or credible testimony. Neither are memes, or fake-news right wing website articles.

Share away, kid.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I read that he was fond of using ghey slurs. That said doesn't mean he wasn't ghey or some variation of non-binary.

Could have been closeted and covering it with feigned homophobia. "Methinks he doth protest too much" was phrased for a good reason.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Trump is now pissed off at his own Supreme Court. Too funny. I'm hearing that he reported billions in losses over multiple years. What a great businessman.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

What the fudge do these paintings or their artists have to do with global warming, climate change, big oil, etc? Why can't people just stop being a-holes?

MSN

What's your problem with a-holes?