What is?
- Thread starter Clifff150
- Start date
- Replies 14K
- Views 418K
If his words had as little value as you are trying to claim, not a single person would have taken bleach internally, not a single person would have refused to wear a mask because it’s a sign of weakness, medical doctors and major corporations would not have immediately been urging people not to drink bleach.
Or is it only THESE words that have no value, because they ended up being stupid as shit, and people got hurt?
For fvck’s sake, after realizing how stupid it was, he tried to walk it back by claiming it was “a sarcastic question” for the reporters.
"I was asking a very sarcastic question to the reporters in the room about disinfectant on the inside," he said during a briefing in the Oval Office on April 24. But it does kill it, and it would kill it on the hands, and that would make things much better. That was done in the form of a sarcastic question to the reporters."
HE admits he fvcked up, and you sycophants STILL say he did nothing wrong.
Christ on ice and Mary in the penalty box, are you followers dedicated.
Last edited:
Like every idiot who still thinks the election was “stolen”?
That’s a lot of idiots.
So an implied suggestion by Trump is not a suggestion.
And a direct one like “go down there and fight like hell” is also not a suggestion.
So basically, anything that he said to do should not have been done.
And yet so many of his followers did.
Weird, huh?
He wasn't implying anything, he was asking a question. He was asking if doctors think they could make something effective like disinfectants are on the virus.
Your problem is you have it buried so deep in your head somehow that Trump told people to do stuff that you have blinded yourself to seeing anything else. If you want to go to your grave thinking he told people to inject or ingest disinfectants that crazy shit is on you.
You're claiming (dishonestly) to be quoting him directly while at the same time inferring something different than his actual words...that's about as dishonest way to present your "facts" as there is...
You are saying the verbatim quote of his words is “dishonest”. Explain the discrepancy you think exists.
“Inferring something different than his actual words”.
Do you even know what the word “infer” MEANS?
infer - deduce or conclude (information) from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements.
Now learn some more English:
implied suggestion - involved, indicated, or suggested without being directly or explicitly stated; tacitly understood
You tried that one already. And you failed already.
The clients provide the evidence. And they even sign their name to it.
Without their signature on the evidence, no hearing occurs.
It's federal regulation.
Oh so you do like you do on web forums.... nag them till they just want you to go away. Got it.
The deductions or conclusions of what Trump ASKED would be a yes or no that the Scientist and Doctors could create something that could work like the disinfectants on the virus but would be safe for humans.
Show us the words Trump used to imply that people should take disinfectants.
I am getting pretty tired of you being stupid because you were told to be stupid. Explains the government job though.
Nope you're asking meaning buddy...keep trying though....you're soooo close to being "right" again
You have a bad habit of speaking when you know nothing.
Evidence isn’t something created after the hearing is scheduled. It’s what the client uses to attempt committing the fraud. The clients sign the documents they submit in the attempt to steal the money.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
About this thread
