What is?

RobGMN

CarAudio.com VIP
5,000+ posts
8,957
790
MN
I’m really confused about wtf that has to do with anything being said
He asked a rhetorical question, but his inferred answer was actually wrong. I hope it was just poor command of the language, and he really does understand about how the human body works.

As for WHY he brought it up, I have no idea. It has nothing to do with what determines a person's sexual orientation. Maybe he things the strawman proves his theory.
Strawmen do the opposite.
 

Buck

Why so Sirius?
5,000+ posts
10+ year member
31,061
1,880
Inside of a pyramid
He asked a rhetorical question, but his inferred answer was actually wrong. I hope it was just poor command of the language, and he really does understand about how the human body works.

As for WHY he brought it up, I have no idea. It has nothing to do with what determines a person's sexual orientation. Maybe he things the strawman proves his theory.
Strawmen do the opposite.

Just in case you were wondering, I think you’re a dingleberry grown out of a test tube.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ThxOne

RobGMN

CarAudio.com VIP
5,000+ posts
8,957
790
MN
Just in case you were wondering, I think you’re a dingleberry grown out of a test tube.
You should know plenty about them, given your preoccupation with scatology.
Do you think it’s caused by your own lack of bowel control?

Are you one of the Floridians who claim their ethnic background as “American”?
 
Last edited:

ThxOne

Professional Driver
5,000+ posts
12,774
2,601
Kentucky
"Adding scenarios"? You DO realize that an absolute like you claim has to cover ALL scenarios, don't you? This is really not that difficult.
Ever hear of the Law Of Conservation of Energy? It doesn't include "except..."
If you are going to state that the sex organs determine orientation, then you have to account for people who don't have them, or have both.
Simple logic.
Reality shreds your theory.
Nope. You are wrong.
Ahhh, but they can. Plenty of paralyzed men and women still have sexual relations with their partner. Once again, reality shreds your theory.
Really, now it's paralyzed men and women and not people born without sex organs.
Your limited command of the language lets you down yet again. You attempted a rhetorical question, but the implied answer was incorrect.
Even if you were trying to say natural conception requires intercourse, you are wrong.
You really DON'T have a clue about human sexuality. So much for your biology degree with "extensive study" in human anatomy, eh?
I hear ya. Once again you think you are right just so you can keep on arguing.
Cute homophobic ad-hominem for a guy who claims to be so accepting of homoseuxuality.
I accept that you are a lover of men.
It's so fun when you get all triggered like a petulant child, as I just shred your posts like a block of mozzarella.

The list grows.
You think by avoiding answers, changing the goal post, adding scenarios is shredding anything??? Like normal all you have done is waste several pages on a forum because you deny natural biology with your compulsion to argue to no end. From post #1 I have said that the male human is built biologically to procreate with a female. It is not a choice, it is how we are built. Anything beyond this is a choice we make to do something else. As per your status quo you come back with irrelevance, what if's, conjecture and stupidity to create arguments out of nothing. There is only one triggered person here Rob and it is you. Triggered at the world. Maybe it is the loss of your parents, probably a divorce or two, maybe your kid(s) hate you. Whatever it was that started it all, I am sure you deserved every bit of it and continue to deserve it. You are a cancer to web forums.
 
Last edited:

Eggs

Junior Member
1,824
550
USA USA USA
15 min city
The party of trust the science.
1680256478600.jpeg
 

ThxOne

Professional Driver
5,000+ posts
12,774
2,601
Kentucky
It's so fun when you get all triggered like a petulant child, as I just shred your posts like a block of mozzarella.

The list grows.
Take this "list" form it into a giant representation of all the diicks you swallow, place it on the ground so it stands tall, climb up above it and then place your well lubricated, male member accepting anus over it and proceed to slide allllllllll the way down until you hear a pop!!
 

RobGMN

CarAudio.com VIP
5,000+ posts
8,957
790
MN
Take this "list" form it into a giant representation of all the diicks you swallow, place it on the ground so it stands tall, climb up above it and then place your well lubricated, male member accepting anus over it and proceed to slide allllllllll the way down until you hear a pop!!
Ahhh, how cute. Little child is grumpy. Maybe he need a nap with his baba and blankey.
 

RobGMN

CarAudio.com VIP
5,000+ posts
8,957
790
MN
Nope. You are wrong.
You failed so hard, you can't dig your way out of it.
Really, now it's paralyzed men and women and not people born without sex organs.
Wll, YOU are the one now using the metric of reproductive capability and sexual activity as a deciding factor of sexual orientation. Paralyzed guys with non-working diicks aren't doing a whole lot of inseminating. Are they?
And neither is someone born without sexual organs. Your theory has collapsed under the weight of its own bullshit.
I hear ya. Once again you think you are right just so you can keep on arguing.

I accept that you are a lover of men.

You think by avoiding answers, changing the goal post, adding scenarios is shredding anything??? Like normal all you have done is waste several pages on a forum because you deny natural biology with your compulsion to argue to no end. From post #1 I have said that the male human is built biologically to procreate with a female. It is not a choice, it is how we are built. Anything beyond this is a choice we make to do something else. As per your status quo you come back with irrelevance, what if's, conjecture and stupidity to create arguments out of nothing. There is only one triggered person here Rob and it is you. Triggered at the world. Maybe it is the loss of your parents, probably a divorce or two, maybe your kid(s) hate you. Whatever it was that started it all, I am sure you deserved every bit of it and continue to deserve it. You are a cancer to web forums.
TL/DR. Not interested in hearing your bullshit theories and claims that you are wholly unable to support with any evidence or facts.
You honestly have no clue what you are talking about, and you prove it her over and over again.

And every time you do, I'll have no problem calling you out on it.
 

ThxOne

Professional Driver
5,000+ posts
12,774
2,601
Kentucky
You failed so hard, you can't dig your way out of it.

Wll, YOU are the one now using the metric of reproductive capability and sexual activity as a deciding factor of sexual orientation. Paralyzed guys with non-working diicks aren't doing a whole lot of inseminating. Are they?
And neither is someone born without sexual organs. Your theory has collapsed under the weight of its own bullshit.

TL/DR. Not interested in hearing your bullshit theories and claims that you are wholly unable to support with any evidence or facts.
You honestly have no clue what you are talking about, and you prove it her over and over again.

And every time you do, I'll have no problem calling you out on it.
Cool, if you are not going to read it then stfu. You have no right to argue here.
 

RobGMN

CarAudio.com VIP
5,000+ posts
8,957
790
MN
Cool, if you are not going to read it then stfu. You have no right to argue here.
Ahhhh, now you are telling me what rights I have on this free Internet forum.

Let me get some popcorn. THIS should be good.
 

spokey9

5 time International Booty Bandit Gold Meldalist
2,623
1,133
NE AR
Considering any species can only be considered successful by its ability to reproduce....evolution doesn't reward those that cant..can't.
 

ThxOne

Professional Driver
5,000+ posts
12,774
2,601
Kentucky
Ahhhh, now you are telling me what rights I have on this free Internet forum.

Let me get some popcorn. THIS should be good.
Yes, I am retard. You want to argue but you refuse to read the other persons post? Really? And you still want to argue? You don't want to argue, you just want to assert your views on everyone. I don't believe at this point it even matters who you are talking too. If they have an opinion or view and you don't like it you will stop at nothing to pound your views in there no matter what. Hmmm, what kind of people do we know of that do that very thing?

Yeah, go get some popcorn you dumb cunt. Explain how everyone is wrong except the few who agree with you on a few things from time to time. Like I said, you are a cancer for web forums. Douche bag.
 

Buck

Why so Sirius?
5,000+ posts
10+ year member
31,061
1,880
Inside of a pyramid
Yes, I am retard. You want to argue but you refuse to read the other persons post? Really? And you still want to argue? You don't want to argue, you just want to assert your views on everyone. I don't believe at this point it even matters who you are talking too. If they have an opinion or view and you don't like it you will stop at nothing to pound your views in there no matter what. Hmmm, what kind of people do we know of that do that very thing?

Yeah, go get some popcorn you dumb cunt. Explain how everyone is wrong except the few who agree with you on a few things from time to time. Like I said, you are a cancer for web forums. Douche bag.
He’s a total Aidsburger. He’s the shit that floats up to the surface of the creek in East Palestine when you throw a rock in the water.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ThxOne
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Participants
Who Replied
Replies
14,170
Views
419,075
Last reply date
Last reply from
Jimi77

Latest threads

Top