The basic steps of the scientific method are: 1) make an observation that describes a problem, 2) create a hypothesis, 3) test the hypothesis, and 4) draw conclusions and refine the hypothesis. ... Critical thinking is a key component of the scientific method. Without it, you cannot use logic to come to conclusions.
Robs steps of the scientific method are: 1) repeat a problem I saw on Facebook over and over 2) make sure it lines up with my politics while making observations 3) only repeat the tests that support my already preconceived conclusions 4) draw conclusions about other people’s morality to avoid refining the hypothesis……critical thought is overrated.
I don’t quote from Facebook, or Instagram, Twatter, memes, Trump, Rand Paul, or any other bullshlt sources.
That’s what Buck and all of the “anti” people are doing. The stuff I reference is a result of an already completed scientific process.
Do you expect me to perform the whole process again to prove the results that have already been achieved by the experts in the field?
You’re buying pre-built equipment from proven sources. Why? With your logic, you should be building your own from scratch. Thiele-Small parameters exist, but you should build 100 boxes through trial and error instead.
Yeah…makes a lot of sense.