MMats Vs. AudioBahn

[bumpin_blazer 5,000+ posts]

well NO **** that's like comparing apples and oranges though ranger man. i'm just saying that RF makes good subs. although you could maybe make those power HX2's get close to an MMATS Juggernaut. yeah right i know juggy's are louder i just like RF.

keep it thumpin,

adam

 

[RangerMan Premium Member]

Originally posted by bumpin_blazer this is to the original guy who posted this. WHAT THE **** IS WRONG WITH RF SUBS. you can take your 1000 watt RF amp with your 2 15" mmats or audiobahns but i can promise you this that i can make my system hit harder with what i have.

 

keep it thumpin,

adam

Your the one who said that it hit harder...

 

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

what has mmats done lately? and i dont think they sound good at all yucky-poo 2 audiobahns set up right would give you more output and if its priced the same i would go two audiobahns .... durability is dependent on user control...i agree with zane about mmats being better built but 2 vs 1 i would go audiobahn..............and dont be a volume master.

 

[bumpin_blazer 5,000+ posts]

right but i was talking about the subs he was talking about. not the juggernauts. i never siad RF subs could hit harder than a juggy.

keep it thumpin,

adam

 

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

why go juggy when you can go treo?

 

[RangerMan Premium Member]

ALL MMATS subs hit hard...this would be a good experiment though. I wonder if the cheaper MMATS hits as hard as a HE2...

 

[bumpin_blazer 5,000+ posts]

that would be interesting. i know i had a friend who was hitting 143 at the cone with a single HE2 in a sealed box running off a 1000 watt bd rockford. he blew the sub about 15 min later but it hit hard for the hour that it lasted.

keep it thumpin,

adam