you sure sound like a supporter of Bush. you said he can turn to his cabinet memebers for advice and decisions. are you retarded, he put those ppl in those positions. if your boss asks you a question very few ppl are going to tell him the absolute truth, most will just blow smoke up you *** to make you feel like you're doing "the right" thing. You have no idea how many of Bush's and Chaney's friends/ corporate owners have profited with this whole debackle of Iraq. Bush's oil company has over a 500% increase in profit since the war. Chaney's defense company has made over $100 Billion since the war. But because these are privately held companies, their profits are not made public. Not to mention that Credit Card companies have made tremendous money with this "Stimulus Package". Bush's #1 campaign contributor for both his terms was MBNA/Bank of America. Over 60% of American's receiving a Stimulus Check are using it to pay down credit card debit, grant it that it is their own fault for getting in debt but 30% intrest on a credit card is just fvcking ridiculous. Maybe you should read more on what Bush has signed into law and what laws he has started. The recent Backruptcy Law that was just signed was written soley by MBNA/Bank of America and pushed through as Bush's #1 priority. Do you know that The Defense company that Dick Chaney owns has a 2:1 ratio over US military presents in the middle east, not to mention that b/c they are contracted out that they have over 10x more armour and ammunition than any US military personel. Get educated! As for the upcoming election, McCain isn't the going to put into any better of a posistion than we are now matter of fact he is going to mess it up even more. He can't even tell you who the war is between in Iraq much less manage it. Obama isn't really that much better b/c he is only saying what the American ppl want to hear, he's openly admitted that he will only do what his advisors tell him to do, just great another puppet in office. If you really want your voice to be heard when you vote, vote for one of those independent ppl at the bottom of the ballet instead of going with popularity.
Yes, I'm a supporter of Bush //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
I didn't even vote for the guy and I personally don't care for him. But as I mentioned, it's not entirely his fault. If he turns to his cabinet and they all agree with him, that decision is not rational, simple economics. For a rational decision to be made you must have full information and it must not be biased.
And just because I state that it's not entirely his fault doesn't mean I support him. In order for change to occur, as I mentioned before, time is necessary. Things don't happen instanteneously, they occur over time, I hope you realize that. Just like real estate market, it's not instantaneous, but it has its ups and downs and will continue to be that way. My mom has been in real estate for about 30+ years, so I know what goes on with that. Right now, getting a job in real estate is very difficult, many people have been laid off, but it wasn't an instant thing, it was gradual. The same goes for the economy as a whole. Some of things people blame Bush for, were because of a gradual change from previous presidency(ies).
The reason why I'm standing up for Bush in this case is because all I hear is Bush did this wrong, he did that wrong, it's all I hear, yet little do people actually KNOW what is going on, they just follow the bandwagon and say things and feel a certain way because of hearsay.
Sure, Bush appointed his cabinet and yes they tend to agree with him, but many people in a position like that don't like it when someone disagrees with them. Honestly, I would prefer someone to disagree with with valid reasoning if I were in a position like that so a proper decision can be made.
Again, the reason why it seems as though I support him is because all people do is bash him and complain saying everything is his fault, when it is not ENTIRELY his fault, nor his cabinet (though some are), but because of a previous President and/or economical condition.
