welp what most do in spl set ups is figure the sweet spot in the resinant frequancy of their vehicle... then pick a slightly higher tuning port...higher the freq the easier it is to produce the wave loudly.....am i correct? then lets just get propper distance for the subs to cut down on phaseshift loss (being it even down to 1/4 wave distance or less) brace and seal every thing getting air tight and achieve the best space in your vehicle to push as much air as you could... then take the mackest sub you can get with 50 batteries and 20 of the baddest amps you want...fact is if the subs are less likely to go to that "magic" impedence" then you will be losing power. you can argue with me until you are blue in the face about this and you will be wrong only because of the point of which this falls...the scenerio? this was chris norris's van in 2001. (45 batteries and 18 amps) he had 3 sets of shocker subs he could have put in..........he had the mack daddies the almost mack daddy and then a total step down sub....what do you think he used? ehehe going by nominal readings the fat subs would have been better. alot better..........but guess what? that was about 3 db off what the smaller sub was doing... now there are other factors in this but the reactive power was the biggest factor...the smaller sub was in the "power zone" of the amp..(other factor was the bigger nominally rated sub also fell apart after 2 test runs...) i can also think of another sub of older times..sound stream spl series.. spl 160 vs. spl 15's ...............................needless to say team stream used the spl 15 because it was more efficent. they had more than enough power to do either sub in any case. and i wont disprove the median point you were making about nominal yes it is the starting point but that is it its the equivilant to a car doing a burn out off the starting line from a "resting" position but after that you can throw it out the window.
