Current events discussion

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I'm curious what cases Rob tried.

He does fancy himself an expert on COTUS. Must have been on vacation when the decision was reached on that case you cited.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

No, your BELIEF that the COTUS only afford protection of right for American Citizens on United States soil.

Your tapdance over to the complaint that criminal immigrants are somehow "rewarded for breaking our laws" only came after I asked you to show your proof that the COTUS and many SCOTUS decisions were incorrect.
Your big "proof" was that my dead grandmother should be ***** and I would be "cool" with it.
Something like this: "So I guess you have to be cool with a ****** entering your granny's house (breaking the law literally), poking her against her will (breaking the law literally) should get to leave that house and await due process?"

Following that logic, you would be "cool" with Russia invading the US and taking over, since you are so "cool" with the insurrectionists' attempts to prevent the legal vote to make Biden POTUS, and prevent Trump from being booted.
So, why do you want Russia to take over the US?

So, you failed to prove that you had effected an amendment to the COTUS, and failed to prove that you had the SCOTUS decisions overturned.

You failed, while continuing to proclaim your BELIEF that immigrants (even illegals) are NOT protected by the COTUS when on our soil.
That's a lot of failing.

No, what you are doing is trying to control what answers you get. It may work with the people you trap with your words at work so you can prosecute them but it won't work with me.

When I say rewarded for breaking our laws I mean by giving the privilege of the protection of OUR constitution. Illegal immigrants didn't fight for those rights and assholes like yourself want to just hand that shit over to murderers, ******, thieves, drug dealers because you hate Trump.

Take your hypotheticals and shove them where the sun don't shine. This isn't about hypotheticals, it's about liberals destroying this country because news channels tell you what to think and do.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I think Rob is implying that the constitution is primary law trumping all other laws in every country around the world

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

a Lie. You have not posted even close to 150. More like 4.

Your lack of ability to comprehend rears its ugly head. Again.
It's amazing how so many different words can confuse you so much.
"I've posted several of them, and have done probably 150." -Robgmn

several - more than two but not many

I never said I posted 150 of my cases.
Wow.

Not sure why you wake up still telling lies. I said last night as a matter of fact, to your ignorant ***, that there is NOTHING wrong with the way either are worded. I gave you opinions and asked your ignorant *** questions which is an incredibly labored thing to do.

I quoted the COTUS. Aside from your MANY statements regarding my intelligence and the meaning of the words, you very clearly posted this: "The COTUS is speaking of Americans.". This is a direct statement that the words in the COTUS are wrong, and that the SCOTUS got it wrong in all the cases where they said the COTUS protects the rights of non-Americans on US soil.

And then you spun off on some stupid tangent about "rewarding criminals".

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I think Rob is implying that the constitution is primary law trumping all other laws in every country around the world

Yes, he's quite stupid.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Your lack of ability to comprehend rears its ugly head. Again.
It's amazing how so many different words can confuse you so much.
"I've posted several of them, and have done probably 150." -Robgmn

several - more than two but not many

I never said I posted 150 of my cases.
Wow.

Yes, focus on that and not the rest of your dumb *** post.

I quoted the COTUS. Aside from your MANY statements regarding my intelligence and the meaning of the words, you very clearly posted this: "The COTUS is speaking of Americans.". This is a direct statement that the words in the COTUS are wrong, and that the SCOTUS got it wrong in all the cases where they said the COTUS protects the rights of non-Americans on US soil.

And then you spun off on some stupid tangent about "rewarding criminals".

Blah blah blah

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES...

Rob, who is that referencing?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

He does fancy himself an expert on COTUS. Must have been on vacation when the decision was reached on that case you cited.

Not an expert at all. But I can easily post the text of it, and of court decisions.

Ibid.; Mezei, supra, at 212 ("[A]liens who have once passed through our gates, even illegally, may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to traditional standards of fairness encompassed in due process of law"

Thxone fancies himself the expert, as he is the one saying the COTUS is wrong, and all the decisions of the SCTOUS have been wrong.
Yet, no amendments have been effected by him, and no cases have been overturned BECAUSE of him.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Thxone fancies himself the expert, as he is the one saying the COTUS is wrong, and all the decisions of the SCTOUS have been wrong.
Yet, no amendments have been effected by him, and no cases have been overturned BECAUSE of him.

There you go again telling lies. Liar, I have not said they are wrong. Are you really this ignorant?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES...

Rob, who is that referencing?

The people who drafted the COTUS.

They are all dead. DO you think the COTUS was only for them, and doesn't count for anyone else?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

The people who drafted the COTUS.

They are all dead. DO you think the COTUS was only for them, and doesn't count for anyone else?

It's right in front of you and because of your EGO you'd rather make a stupid statement.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

There you go again telling lies. Liar, I have not said they are wrong. Are you really this ignorant?

If I am wrong in quoting them, then they are by default wrong.

If I quote Ohm's law, and you say I am wrong, then by default you are saying Ohm's law is wrong.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

If I am wrong in quoting them, then they are by default wrong.

If I quote Ohm's law, and you say I am wrong, then by default you are saying Ohm's law is wrong.

If I think they are wrong I will say I think they are wrong. I have not done that. You are responding to your own thoughts and assumptions.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

They're not being deprived of life, liberty or property. They're being deported. Furthermore, its not the States doing it, it's the Fed.

You conveniently skipped the due process part.
Trump himself said they need to skip due process for these cases.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

If I think they are wrong I will say I think they are wrong. I have not done that. You are responding to your own thoughts and assumptions.

So when you said the COTUS only protects the rights of US Citizens on US soil, you didn't actually mean it?
What DID you mean by that?

Or ar you continuing to tapdance away form that claim after being proved wrong again?