That has nothing to do with who it protects.The COTUS is worded and written just fine... but you are a moron. A fool with no comprehension skills AT ALL.
Here:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Right off the bat the COTUS states who this is for and who it is talking about. WE the people of the United States. Not people who enter her illegally. You know, the people you want to reward for breaking our laws. When the COTUS says Any Person it is still talking about any AMERICAN.
OMG!!! Wow. Yup, it was written to protect the world.That has nothing to do with who it protects.
WE THE PEOPLE are the ones who made it. With your logic, the only people it would then apply to are the ones who wrote it.
And they are all long dead.
Every legal scholar, the SCOTUS, and the words of the COTUS itself say you are wrong.
So once again: SHOW US ALL THE ERROR OF THE WORDING OF THE COTUS, THE PRROF THAT YOU GOT IT CORRECTED, AND THE PROOF THAT YOU GOT ALL THE SCOTUS CASES OVERTURNED.
Until you do that, your beliefs hvae no value whatsoever with regard to reality.
No shit. That's part of due process.Ibid.; Mezei, supra, at 212 ("[A]liens who have once passed through our gates, even illegally, may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to traditional standards of fairness encompassed in due process of law"
And they can be detained while doing so.
Listen moron. I didn't say either was wrong. You egotistical fucktard. I am saying YOU are wrong.No shit. That's part of due process.
And proves nothing about your belief that the COTUS and SCOTUS are wrong.
Tapdancing and deflection.OMG!!! Wow. Yup, it was written to protect the world.
Protection. You mean it doesn't say anything about welfare, cellphones, hotels, American resources, American jobs?Tapdancing and deflection.
Too bad AI had no answer for you, huh?
Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67, 77 (1976) (Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.)
Yet more deflection.If they can be detained as part of due process of law........................................ then why the **** do you liberals have a problem with ICE doing their job?
I KNOW>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because TRUMP!!!
Seriously.... PROOF READ!Yet more deflection.
Show us the amendment you effected.
Show us the SCOTUS cases you got overturned.
Show us how illegals on our soil do not have the protected right of due process.
Trump is not the answer. Obama is not the answer. Biden is not the answer.
AI cannot give you the answer. This is all on you to prove your belief that illegals on our soil do not have protected rights.
So... ******? Seen one yet?Yet more deflection.
Show us the amendment you effected.
Show us the SCOTUS cases you got overturned.
Show us how illegals on our soil do not have the protected right of due process.
Trump is not the answer. Obama is not the answer. Biden is not the answer.
AI cannot give you the answer. This is all on you to prove your belief that illegals on our soil do not have protected rights.